Literature DB >> 16043216

Randomized controlled trial of a repeat mammography intervention: effect of adherence definitions on results.

Melissa R Partin1, Jonathan S Slater, Lee Caplan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As overall mammography rates approach national goals, mammography promotion efforts must increasingly focus on repeat adherence. This randomized controlled trial examined the effect of two interventions on repeat mammography utilization using various adherence definitions.
METHODS: 1,558 women aged 40-63 receiving a mammogram through a federally funded screening program were randomized to three groups: mailed reminder (minimum group); mailed thank you card, newsletters, and reminder (maximum group); no mailings (control). The primary outcome (repeat mammogram) was assessed 13, 15, 18, and 24 months after the qualifying mammogram using administrative data.
RESULTS: The proportions receiving a repeat mammogram within 13 months were 0.28, 0.30, and 0.32 for control, minimum, and maximum groups, respectively. The corresponding proportions were 0.38, 0.43, and 0.45 at 15 months; 0.43, 0.49, and 0.51 at 18 months; and 0.47, 0.52, and 0.54 at 24 months. There were no significant differences across study groups at 13 months. The differences between control and maximum subjects at 15, 18, and 24 months were statistically significant. The differences between control and minimum subjects were significant only at 18 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The two low-cost mailed interventions evaluated modestly increased repeat mammography utilization. However, effects were not visible until at least 15 months after the qualifying mammogram.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16043216     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  15 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Deborah J del Junco
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Concordance of population-based estimates of mammography screening.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Casey L Luce; Evette Ludman; Amy E Bonomi; Paul A Fishman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Longitudinal predictors of nonadherence to maintenance of mammography.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Jo Anne Earp; Noel T Brewer; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Hongyuan Gao; Melissa L Anderson; Tracy Onega; Susan Brandzel; Melissa A Rabelhofer; Susan Carol Bradford; Erin J Aiello Bowles
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Sustaining mammography screening among the medically underserved: a follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  Terry C Davis; Connie L Arnold; Charles L Bennett; Michael S Wolf; Dachao Liu; Alfred Rademaker
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cervical Cancer Education Intervention for Latinas Delivered Through Interactive, Multimedia Kiosks.

Authors:  Armando Valdez; Anna M Napoles; Susan L Stewart; Alvaro Garza
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Self-report versus medical records for assessing cancer-preventive services delivery.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Karissa A Hahn; Shawna V Hudson; Eric K Shaw; Jesse C Crosson; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Factors associated with annual-interval mammography for women in their 40s.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Suzanne C O'Neill; Barbara K Rimer; Jessica T DeFrank; J Michael Bowling; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Prospective study of factors predicting adherence to surveillance mammography in women treated for breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Shelby; Cindy D Scipio; Tamara J Somers; Mary Scott Soo; Kevin P Weinfurt; Francis J Keefe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Effect of a multimodal reminder program on repeat mammogram screening.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; Jennifer Schneider; Mary M Rix; Kara Keels; Stephanie Schoap; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.