OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of scanner collimation on the ability to detect small cardiac vessels using electron beam CT coronary angiography (EBA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: EBA scans from 40 patients who underwent study on two separate occasions with 3 mm (initial scan) and 1.5 mm (follow-up scan) collimation protocols were analyzed. Vessels of <2 mm in diameter were identified. RESULTS: The 1.5 mm collimation allowed 3-D visualization of 129 vessels<2 mm in diameter, while 3 mm collimation only allowed visualization of 89 vessels (p<0.001). The right coronary artery branches and distal LAD segments though were not displayed satisfactorily in almost half of the 3-D studies with either protocol. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant improvement in detection of small cardiac vessels with a 1.5 mm collimation EBA protocol compared to a 3 mm protocol. Both protocols though were insufficient for reliable visualization of the right coronary artery branches and distal LAD segments.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of scanner collimation on the ability to detect small cardiac vessels using electron beam CT coronary angiography (EBA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: EBA scans from 40 patients who underwent study on two separate occasions with 3 mm (initial scan) and 1.5 mm (follow-up scan) collimation protocols were analyzed. Vessels of <2 mm in diameter were identified. RESULTS: The 1.5 mm collimation allowed 3-D visualization of 129 vessels<2 mm in diameter, while 3 mm collimation only allowed visualization of 89 vessels (p<0.001). The right coronary artery branches and distal LAD segments though were not displayed satisfactorily in almost half of the 3-D studies with either protocol. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant improvement in detection of small cardiac vessels with a 1.5 mm collimation EBA protocol compared to a 3 mm protocol. Both protocols though were insufficient for reliable visualization of the right coronary artery branches and distal LAD segments.
Authors: M J Budoff; R J Oudiz; C P Zalace; H Bakhsheshi; S L Goldberg; W J French; T G Rami; B H Brundage Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1999-03-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: C N Enzweiler; D E Kivelitz; T H Wiese; M Taupitz; S Höhn; A C Borges; L Pietsch; P Dohmen; G Baumann; B Hamm Journal: Radiology Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Koen Nieman; Filippo Cademartiri; Pedro A Lemos; Rolf Raaijmakers; Peter M T Pattynama; Pim J de Feyter Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Songshou Mao; Janis Child; Sivi Carson; Steve C K Liu; Ronald J Oudiz; Matthew J Budoff Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Dieter Ropers; Ulrich Baum; Karsten Pohle; Katharina Anders; Stefan Ulzheimer; Bernd Ohnesorge; Christian Schlundt; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690