Literature DB >> 16040100

Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation.

Gary W Chien1, Albert A Mikhail, Marcelo A Orvieto, Gregory P Zagaja, Mitchell H Sokoloff, Charles B Brendler, Arieh L Shalhav.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We present our technique for clipless antegrade neurovascular bundle preservation during robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, along with short-term follow-up of our patients' sexual function. TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Using the da Vinci three-arm robotic system, we performed robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using a transperitoneal approach in an antegrade fashion. After division of the bladder neck, the posterior plane of the prostate was developed distally toward the apex of the prostate in the midline. This plane was then developed completely, releasing the vascular pedicles and neurovascular bundles in a medial to lateral direction, with occasional use of bipolar cautery and without the use of clips or monopolar cautery. Patients with a minimal follow-up of 3 months who did not require open conversion were included in this study. A total of 56 patients met these inclusion criteria between February 2003 and May 2004, with a mean follow-up of 6 months. Patients were given the validated Rand Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Health Survey, version 2, with the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The overall score for both unilateral and bilateral nerve-sparing groups was 35.0, 39.7, 49.4, and 49.6 at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. These coincided with a return to baseline potency rate of 47%, 54%, 66%, and 69% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Antegrade dissection of the neurovascular bundle, avoiding the use of clips or monopolar cautery during robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, may result in early return of sexual function and overall outcome similar to that after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16040100     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  15 in total

Review 1.  Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anup Kumar; Sarvesh Tandon; Srinivas Samavedi; Vladimir Mouraviev; Anthony S Bates; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-01

3.  Athermal early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Geoffrey Coughlin; Pankaj P Dangle; Kenneth J Palmer; Srinivas Samevedi; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-02-03

4.  Is a return to baseline sexual function possible? An analysis of sexual function outcomes following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Adam W Levinson; Hugh J Lavery; Nicholas T Ward; Li-Ming Su; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Developing minimally invasive surgery centers within kaiser permanente: the integrated multidisciplinary experience of los angeles.

Authors:  Gary W Chien; Maher A Abbas
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2009

6.  High prostatic fascia release or standard nerve sparing? A viewpoint from the Royal Melbourne Hospital.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-08-28

7.  Is the transition from open to robotic prostatectomy fair to your patients? A single-surgeon comparison with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Robert B Nadler; Jessica T Casey; Lee C Zhao; Neema Navai; Zachary L Smith; Ali Zhumkhawala; Amanda M Macejko
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-11-19

8.  Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing.

Authors:  Ashutosh K Tewari; Adnan Ali; Sheela Metgud; Nithin Theckumparampil; Abhishek Srivastava; Francesca Khani; Brian D Robinson; Naveen Gumpeni; Maria M Shevchuk; Matthieu Durand; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Jinyi Li; Robert Leung; Alexandra Peyser; Siobhan Gruschow; Vinita Asija; Niyati Harneja
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Impact of prostate weight on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with a posterior approach to the seminal vesicle.

Authors:  Takahiro Yasui; Keiichi Tozawa; Satoshi Kurokawa; Atsushi Okada; Kentaro Mizuno; Yukihiro Umemoto; Noriyasu Kawai; Shoichi Sasaki; Yutaro Hayashi; Yoshiyuki Kojima; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 10.  Advances in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy over Time.

Authors:  Emma F P Jacobs; Ronald Boris; Timothy A Masterson
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2013-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.