Literature DB >> 27628447

Athermal early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Geoffrey Coughlin1, Pankaj P Dangle2, Kenneth J Palmer3, Srinivas Samevedi4, Vipul R Patel5.   

Abstract

While cancer control is the primary objective of radical prostatectomy, maintenance of sexual function is a priority for the majority of men presenting with prostate cancer. Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is the challenging and critical step of radical prostatectomy with regards to maintenance of potency. The objective of this study is to describe the surgical steps of our hybrid technique: athermal early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. This technique involves releasing the neurovascular bundle in a retrograde direction from the apex toward the base of the prostate, during an antegrade prostatectomy. It is a hybrid of the traditional open and the laparoscopic approaches to nerve sparing. With this approach we are able to clearly delineate the path of the bundle and avoid inadvertently injuring it when controlling the prostatic pedicle. Our hybrid nerve-sparing technique combines aspects of the traditional open anatomical approach with those of the laparoscopic antegrade approach. The benefits of robotic technology allow a retrograde neurovascular bundle dissection to be performed during an antegrade radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional outcomes; Nerve sparing; Robotic prostatectomy; Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP)

Year:  2009        PMID: 27628447     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-009-0127-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  16 in total

1.  Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering; Louis Eichel; David Chou; Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention.

Authors:  P C Walsh; P J Donker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Lateral pedicle control during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: refined technique.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Osamu Ukimura; Mauricio Rubinstein; Antonio Finelli; Alireza Moinzadeh; Dinesh Singh; Jihad Kaouk; Tsuneharu Miki; Mihir Desai
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy with preservation of potency. Results using a new nerve-sparing technique.

Authors:  P C Walsh; J L Mostwin
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1984-12

5.  Neuroanatomical approach to radical cystoprostatectomy with preservation of sexual function.

Authors:  P N Schlegel; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations.

Authors:  P C Walsh; H Lepor; J C Eggleston
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Distress due to unwanted side-effects of prostate cancer treatment is related to impaired well-being (quality of life).

Authors:  AR Helgason; J Adolfsson; P Dickman; M Fredrikson; G Steineck
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: effects of hemostatic energy sources on the recovery of cavernous nerve function in a canine model.

Authors:  Albert M Ong; Li-Ming Su; Ioannis Varkarakis; Takeshi Inagaki; Richard E Link; Sam B Bhayani; Alex Patriciu; Barbara Crain; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Ohio State University technique.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Ketul K Shah; Rahul K Thaly; Hugh Lavery
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2007-02-28

10.  Waning sexual function--the most important disease-specific distress for patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  A R Helgason; J Adolfsson; P Dickman; M Fredrikson; S Arver; G Steineck
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Preoperative prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan.

Authors:  Takeshi Hashimoto; Kunihiko Yoshioka; Tatsuo Gondo; Choichiro Ozu; Yutaka Horiguchi; Kazunori Namiki; Yoshio Ohno; Makoto Ohori; Jun Nakashima; Masaaki Tachibana
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Techniques of robotic radical prostatectomy for the management of prostate cancer: which one, when and why.

Authors:  Shuo Liu; Ashok Hemal
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

Review 3.  A review of technical progression in the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Eric Y Cho; Kevin K Yang; Ziho Lee; Daniel D Eun
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

4.  Toggling Technique Allows Retrograde Early Release to Facilitate Neurovascular Bundle Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Study.

Authors:  Ji Sung Shim; Jong Hyun Tae; Tae Il Noh; Seok Ho Kang; Jun Cheon; Jeong Gu Lee; Vipul R Patel; Sung Gu Kang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Nerve spare robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with amniotic membranes: medium term outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan Noël; Anya Mascarenhas; Ela Patel; Sunil Reddy; Marco Sandri; Seetharam Bhat; Marcio Moschovas; Travis Rogers; Subuhee Ahmed; Daniel Stirt; Vipul Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-01-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.