Literature DB >> 28424909

Comparison of clinical outcomes and quality of life between laparoscopic and open central pancreatectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy.

Ren-Chao Zhang1, Bin Zhang2, Yi-Ping Mou3, Xiao-Wu Xu1, Yu-Cheng Zhou1, Chao-Jie Huang1, Jia-Yu Zhou2, Wei-Wei Jin2, Chao Lu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The studies comparing laparoscopic and open central pancreatectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy are limited. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients undergoing laparoscopic and open central pancreatectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy.
METHODS: Between December 1997 and December 2015, patients who underwent central pancreatectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy were reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups as laparoscopic central pancreatectomy (LCP) and open central pancreatectomy (OCP). Data considered for comparison analysis were patient demographics, intraoperative variables, morbidity, postoperative hospital stay, mortality, pathologic findings, and quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire).
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (17 LCP and 19 OCP) were included in the final analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. The operating time (280.4 ± 33.6 vs. 290.5 ± 62.5 min, p = 0.455) were similar between two groups. LCP group showed significantly lower estimated blood loss (76.4 ± 70.3 vs. 390.3 ± 279.0 ml, p = 0.001), shorter first flatus time (2.4 ± 0.9 vs. 3.9 ± 1.3 days, p = 0.001), and shorter diet start time (4.1 ± 2.2 vs. 6.1 ± 2.4 days, p = 0.030). However, the postoperative hospital stay was not significantly different between two groups (15.6 ± 12.1 vs. 24.0 ± 27.5 days, p = 0.347). Postoperative outcomes, including morbidity (58.8 vs. 52.6%, p = 0.749), pancreatic fistula rates (≥grade B: 17.6 vs. 36.8%, p = 0.106), and mortality, were similar in the 2 groups. The median follow-up period was 45 months (range 4-216 months). No local recurrence or distant metastasis was detected in either group. On the follow-up survey, the total quality of life score (702.9 ± 47.9 vs. 671.8 ± 94.1), physical health score (353.9 ± 24.8 vs. 326.6 ± 67.6) and mental health score (349.0 ± 26.5 vs. 345.2 ± 34.6) were higher in the LCP group compared with the OCP group. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The score in role physical (100 vs. 73.1 ± 4.8, p = 0.042) was significantly higher in LCP group, and not statistically significant in other areas (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: LCP with pancreaticojejunostomy is safe and feasible for benign or borderline malignant lesions in the pancreatic neck and proximal body. Compared to OCP, LCP is associated with lower estimated blood loss, faster recovery, and better quality of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central pancreatectomy; Comparative study; Laparoscopy; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28424909     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5552-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  26 in total

1.  Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Elena Orsenigo; Paolo Baccari; Guido Bissolotti; Carlo Staudacher
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Laparoscopic long sleeve pancreaticogastrostomy (LPG): a novel pancreatic anastomosis following central pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Long R Jiao; Tamara M H Gall; Mikael H Sodergren; Ruifang Fan
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Pure laparoscopic middle pancreatectomy: single-center experience with 13 cases.

Authors:  Safi Dokmak; Béatrice Aussilhou; Fadhel Samir Ftériche; Philippe Levy; Philippe Ruszniewski; Jacques Belghiti; Alain Sauvanet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic approach for solitary insulinoma: a multicentre study.

Authors:  A Ayav; L Bresler; L Brunaud; P Boissel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Initial experience in total laparoscopic central pancreatectomy with pancreatogastrostomy.

Authors:  Chong Yi Jiang; Wei Wang
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.194

6.  Totally laparoscopic Roux-en-Y duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after middle pancreatectomy: a consecutive nine-case series at a single institution.

Authors:  Fernando Rotellar; Fernando Pardo; Custodia Montiel; Alberto Benito; Fernando M Regueira; Ignacio Poveda; Pablo Martí-Cruchaga; Javier A Cienfuegos
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  What indication, morbidity and mortality for central pancreatectomy in oncological surgery? A systematic review.

Authors:  Michele Santangelo; Anna Esposito; Vincenzo Tammaro; Armando Calogero; Carmen Criscitiello; Giuseppe Roberti; Maria Candida; Niccolò Rupealta; Antonio Pisani; Nicola Carlomagno
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 8.  Systematic review of central pancreatectomy and meta-analysis of central versus distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  C Iacono; G Verlato; A Ruzzenente; T Campagnaro; C Bacchelli; A Valdegamberi; L Bortolasi; A Guglielmi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Laparoscopic assisted central pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction - An alternative surgical technique for central pancreatic mass resection.

Authors:  Iswanto Sucandy; Christopher C Pfeifer; David G Sheldon
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2010-09

10.  Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy for solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas: our experience with ten cases.

Authors:  Xue-Min Chen; Yue Zhang; Dong-Lin Sun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Surgical resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm by minimally invasive surgery-the robotic approach?

Authors:  Roxanne Y A Teo; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-02

2.  The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Paper on the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  James R Howe; Nipun B Merchant; Claudius Conrad; Xavier M Keutgen; Julie Hallet; Jeffrey A Drebin; Rebecca M Minter; Terry C Lairmore; Jennifer F Tseng; Herbert J Zeh; Steven K Libutti; Gagandeep Singh; Jeffrey E Lee; Thomas A Hope; Michelle K Kim; Yusuf Menda; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Jennifer A Chan; Rodney F Pommier
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs for Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhengyan Li; Qingchuan Zhao; Bin Bai; Gang Ji; Yezhou Liu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal versus central pancreatectomy for tumors in the pancreatic neck and proximal body.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Qiaoyu Xu; Chunlu Tan; Xing Wang; Bing Peng; Xubao Liu; Kezhou Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Laparoscopic versus open pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma: separate propensity score matching analyses of distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Chao-Jie Huang; Qi-Long Chen; Ren-Chao Zhang; Miao-Zun Zhang; Guan-Yu Wang; Xian-Fa Wang; Yi-Ping Mou; Jia-Fei Yan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Intraoperative Transfusion is Independently Associated with a Worse Prognosis in Resected Pancreatic Cancer-a Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Si Youn Kim; Munseok Choi; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Seoung Yoon Rho; Woo Jung Lee; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.