Literature DB >> 10218211

[Bone densitometry by dual energy methods].

D Felsenberg1, W Gowin.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is mainly diagnosed by means of bone densitometry. Dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations represent the basis for a highly reproducible and correct measurement. At present, densitometry is the only method at our disposal capable of assessing material-related fracture risk. The calculation of general fracture risk is dependent on a number of varios factors and is, therefore, not to be deduced from bone density values only. Reference values are necessary in order to estimate bone strength. The most sensible way to achieve this is to compare measured values with a normal, healthy population (T score). Material-related fracture risk increases with the decrease of bone density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10218211     DOI: 10.1007/s001170050495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  14 in total

Review 1.  Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Trabecular bone structure analysis in the osteoporotic spine using a clinical in vivo setup for 64-slice MDCT imaging: comparison to microCT imaging and microFE modeling.

Authors:  Ahi S Issever; Thomas M Link; Marie Kentenich; Patrik Rogalla; Karsten Schwieger; Markus B Huber; Andrew J Burghardt; Sharmila Majumdar; Gerd Diederichs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Time dependency of bone density estimation from computed tomography with intravenous contrast agent administration.

Authors:  K Acu; M Scheel; A S Issever
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.

Authors:  Richard Bostelmann; Alexander Keiler; Hans Jakob Steiger; Armin Scholz; Jan Frederick Cornelius; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Feasibility of simultaneous computed tomographic colonography and fully automated bone mineral densitometry in a single examination.

Authors:  Ronald M Summers; Nicolai Baecher; Jianhua Yao; Jiamin Liu; Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Suvimol Hill
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  [The common occurrence of osteoarthritis and osteoporosis and the value of markers of bone turnover].

Authors:  P Drees; J Decking; V Ghezel-Ahmadi; K-S Delank; B Wilhelm; A Eckardt
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Bone fragility and imaging techniques.

Authors:  Giovanni D'Elia; Giuseppe Caracchini; Loredana Cavalli; Paolo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-09

8.  Osteoporosis and atherosclerosis: a post-mortem MDCT study of an elderly cohort.

Authors:  A S Issever; M Kentenich; T Köhlitz; G Diederichs; E Zimmermann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Bone mineral density values derived from routine lumbar spine multidetector row CT predict osteoporotic vertebral fractures and screw loosening.

Authors:  B J Schwaiger; A S Gersing; T Baum; P B Noël; C Zimmer; J S Bauer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Axial pullout strength comparison of different screw designs: fenestrated screw, dual outer diameter screw and standard pedicle screw.

Authors:  Evangelos Christodoulou; Suresh Chinthakunta; Divya Reddy; Saif Khalil; Thomas Apostolou; Philipp Drees; Konstantinos Kafchitsas
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.