Literature DB >> 16035221

Modelling motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain control: electrical potential field, activating functions and responses of simple nerve fibre models.

L Manola1, B H Roelofsen, J Holsheimer, E Marani, J Geelen.   

Abstract

This computer modelling study on motor cortex stimulation (MCS) introduced a motor cortex model, developed to calculate the imposed electrical potential field characteristics and the initial response of simple fibre models to stimulation of the precentral gyrus by an epidural electrode, as applied in the treatment of chronic, intractable pain. The model consisted of two parts: a three-dimensional volume conductor based on tissue conductivities and human anatomical data, in which the stimulation-induced potential field was computed, and myelinated nerve fibre models allowing the calculation of their response to this field. A simple afferent fibre branch and three simple efferent fibres leaving the cortex at different positions in the precentral gyrus were implemented. It was shown that the thickness of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) layer between the dura mater and the cortex below the stimulating electrode substantially affected the distribution of the electrical potential field in the precentral gyrus and thus the threshold stimulus for motor responses and the therapeutic stimulation amplitude. When the CSF thickness was increased from 0 to 2.5 mm, the load impedance decreased by 28%, and the stimulation amplitude increased by 6.6 V for each millimetre of CSF. Owing to the large anode-cathode distance (10 mm centre-to-centre) in MCS, the cathodal fields in mono- and bipolar stimulation were almost identical. Calculation of activating functions and fibre responses showed that only nerve fibres with a directional component parallel to the electrode surface were excitable by a cathode, whereas fibres perpendicular to the electrode surface were excitable under an anode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16035221     DOI: 10.1007/bf02345810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  24 in total

1.  The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system.

Authors:  F Rattay
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 2.  Motor cortex stimulation for central and neuropathic pain: current status.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Brown; Nicholas M Barbaro
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Recruitment of dorsal column fibers in spinal cord stimulation: influence of collateral branching.

Authors:  J J Struijk; J Holsheimer; G G van der Heide; H B Boom
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. I. Evidence from chronaxie measurements.

Authors:  L G Nowak; J Bullier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cerebellar input to corticothalamic neurons in layers V and VI in the motor cortex.

Authors:  J Na; S Kakei; Y Shinoda
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.304

6.  [Study of some morphologic aspects of the human dura mater].

Authors:  D F Jiang
Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  1990-02

7.  A model of the electrical behaviour of myelinated sensory nerve fibres based on human data.

Authors:  W A Wesselink; J Holsheimer; H B Boom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Electrical stimulation of motor cortex for pain control: a combined PET-scan and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  L García-Larrea; R Peyron; P Mertens; M C Gregoire; F Lavenne; D Le Bars; P Convers; F Mauguière; M Sindou; B Laurent
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Chronic motor cortex stimulation in the treatment of central and neuropathic pain. Correlations between clinical, electrophysiological and anatomical data.

Authors:  J P Nguyen; J P Lefaucheur; P Decq; T Uchiyama; A Carpentier; D Fontaine; P Brugières; B Pollin; A Fève; S Rostaing; P Cesaro; Y Keravel
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Cortical damage from Zenker's solution applied to the dura mater.

Authors:  J G McComb; G J Withers; R L Davis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  26 in total

1.  Determining which mechanisms lead to activation in the motor cortex: a modeling study of transcranial magnetic stimulation using realistic stimulus waveforms and sulcal geometry.

Authors:  R Salvador; S Silva; P J Basser; P C Miranda
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  The "mirror" estimate: an intuitive predictor of membrane polarization during extracellular stimulation.

Authors:  Sébastien Joucla; Blaise Yvert
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Characterization of the effects of the human dura on macro- and micro-electrocorticographic recordings.

Authors:  David T Bundy; Erik Zellmer; Charles M Gaona; Mohit Sharma; Nicholas Szrama; Carl Hacker; Zachary V Freudenburg; Amy Daitch; Daniel W Moran; Eric C Leuthardt
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Activating function of needle electrodes in anisotropic tissue.

Authors:  Liheng Guo; Jonathan P Cranford; John C Neu; Wanda Krassowska Neu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Chronic deep cerebellar stimulation promotes long-term potentiation, microstructural plasticity, and reorganization of perilesional cortical representation in a rodent model.

Authors:  Jessica Cooperrider; Havan Furmaga; Ela Plow; Hyun-Joo Park; Zhihong Chen; Grahame Kidd; Kenneth B Baker; John T Gale; Andre G Machado
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Computationally optimized ECoG stimulation with local safety constraints.

Authors:  Seyhmus Guler; Moritz Dannhauer; Biel Roig-Solvas; Alexis Gkogkidis; Rob Macleod; Tonio Ball; Jeffrey G Ojemann; Dana H Brooks
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Polarity of cortical electrical stimulation differentially affects neuronal activity of deep and superficial layers of rat motor cortex.

Authors:  Azadeh Yazdan-Shahmorad; Daryl R Kipke; Mark J Lehmkuhle
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS.

Authors:  Paula Faria; Mark Hallett; Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Optimal spacing of surface electrode arrays for brain-machine interface applications.

Authors:  Marc W Slutzky; Luke R Jordan; Todd Krieg; Ming Chen; David J Mogul; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Controlling stimulation strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy via current amplitude and electrode size and spacing: comparison with magnetic seizure therapy.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.