Literature DB >> 16034046

Genetic services for familial cancer patients: a follow-up survey of National Cancer Institute Cancer Centers.

Meira Epplein1, Ksenia P Koon, Scott D Ramsey, John D Potter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anecdotal reports suggest that the volume of services offered to individuals concerned with hereditary cancer risk has increased substantially in recent years. As a follow-up to our 1993 survey, we sought to determine how the scope and volume of genetic services has changed between 1993 and 2002.
METHODS: We surveyed the 61 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers in operation in 2002 using an updated version of the questionnaire from 1993. Analysis included frequencies and summary statistics.
RESULTS: The majority of cancer centers responding (46 of 56 centers; 82.1%) provided some genetic services for evaluation of familial cancer, which is a higher proportion than in 1993 (50%; P < .01). Almost all centers (42 of 46 centers; 91.3%) provided services not only to cancer patients and their families, but also to individuals concerned with risk, which is a change (P = .01) from 1993, when 64.7% of centers offered such services. In addition, increases have been found for most other measures of services rendered for familial genetic services.
CONCLUSION: As public awareness of cancer susceptibility genes has grown markedly in recent years, the demand has also grown for genetic services to assess familial cancer risk. Major deleterious genetic mutations are rare, and much of the current research in genetic variation focuses on higher prevalence variants that carry lower risks. This may suggest that testing for mutations will move from genetics clinics to primary care and specialty practices. Thus, it is unclear whether the scope and volume of cancer center genetics services will continue to grow as rapidly as they have over the last decade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16034046     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  18 in total

1.  Sharing genetic test results in Lynch syndrome: communication with close and distant relatives.

Authors:  Elena M Stoffel; Beth Ford; Rowena C Mercado; Darashana Punglia; Wendy Kohlmann; Peggy Conrad; Amie Blanco; Kristen M Shannon; Mark Powell; Stephen B Gruber; Jonathan Terdiman; Daniel C Chung; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  A pre-visit tailored website enhances counselees' realistic expectations and knowledge and fulfils information needs for breast cancer genetic counselling.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Dick Lindhout; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Examination of the Patient-Focused Impact of Cancer Telegenetics Among a Rural Population: Comparison with Traditional In-Person Services.

Authors:  Nan M Solomons; Amanda E Lamb; Frances L Lucas; Eileen F McDonald; Susan Miesfeldt
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  Acceptability of telemedicine and other cancer genetic counseling models of service delivery in geographically remote settings.

Authors:  Eileen McDonald; Amanda Lamb; Barbara Grillo; Lee Lucas; Susan Miesfeldt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Physician Risk Assessment Knowledge Regarding BRCA Genetics Testing.

Authors:  Jason Cohn; William Blazey; David Tegay; Brian Harper; Sharon Koehler; Brookshield Laurent; Vivian Chan; Min-Kyung Jung; Bhuma Krishnamachari
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Decisional outcomes of maternal disclosure of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to children.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Darren Mays; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Katherine A Schneider; Judy E Garber; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Cancer genetic risk assessment and referral patterns in primary care.

Authors:  Hetal S Vig; Joanne Armstrong; Brian L Egleston; Carla Mazar; Michele Toscano; Angela R Bradbury; Mary B Daly; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2009-12

8.  The updated Swedish family-cancer database used to assess familial risks of prostate cancer during rapidly increasing incidence.

Authors:  Kari Hemminki; Charlotta Granström; Jan Sundquist; Justo Lorenzo Bermejo
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.857

9.  Family history of pancreatic cancer in a high-risk cancer clinic: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; James J Dignam; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  Management of genetic syndromes predisposing to gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Susan Miesfeldt; Amanda Lamb; Christine Duarte
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.