Literature DB >> 10759176

A systematic directional error in 2-D arm movements increases with increasing delay between visual target presentation and movement execution.

N Smyrnis1, P Gourtzelidis, I Evdokimidis.   

Abstract

Forty-seven normal subjects performed two-dimensional arm movements on a digitizer board using a mouse device. The movements were projected on a computer monitor. Subjects were instructed to move the mouse using the whole arm from a center position to a peripheral target so that the projected movement would pass over the target without stopping on the target. A large number of targets (360) were used to cover the entire directional continuum. The direction of the arm movement was the parameter of interest, which was measured at an initial position, at one third of the distance towards the target, and at the vicinity of the target. Four conditions of delay between target presentation and movement execution were used (0, 2, 4, 6 s). A systematic directional error was observed at the initial portion of the trajectory. This error resulted from a clustering of movement directions on an axis that was perpendicular to the axis of the resting forearm before movement onset. This pattern of errors can be explained by the initial inertial anisotropy of the arm. As the trajectory evolved, a different directional error emerged, resulting from a clustering of movement directions in two orthogonal axes. This pattern of directional error increased in amplitude as the delay increased, in contrast to the error at the initial portion of the trajectory which remained invariant with increasing delay. Finally, the information transmitted by the movement direction was shown to increase with the evolution of the trajectory. The increase in delay resulted in a decrease in directional-information transmission. It is proposed that the directional bias towards the end of the movement trajectory might reflect the action of "movement primitives", that is patterns of muscle activation resulting from spinal interneuronal activation. It is further proposed that the directional bias observed at the vicinity of the target might reflect a loss of cortical directional information with increasing delay between target presentation and movement onset.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10759176     DOI: 10.1007/s002219900294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  10 in total

1.  The effects of increasing memory load on the directional accuracy of pointing movements to remembered targets.

Authors:  Christos Theleritis; Nikolaos Smyrnis; Asimakis Mantas; Ioannis Evdokimidis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Independent sources of anisotropy in visual orientation representation: a visual and a cognitive oblique effect.

Authors:  Panagiota Balikou; Pavlos Gourtzelidis; Asimakis Mantas; Konstantinos Moutoussis; Ioannis Evdokimidis; Nikolaos Smyrnis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perception action interaction: the oblique effect in the evolving trajectory of arm pointing movements.

Authors:  Asimakis Mantas; Ioannis Evdokimidis; Nikolaos Smyrnis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Memory pointing in children and adults: dissociations in the maturation of spatial and temporal movement parameters.

Authors:  George Pantes; Asimakis Mantas; Ioannis Evdokimidis; Nikolaos Smyrnis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Amplitude spectrum EEG signal evidence for the dissociation of motor and perceptual spatial working memory in the human brain.

Authors:  Nikolaos Smyrnis; Foteini Protopapa; Evangelos Tsoukas; Allison Balogh; Constantinos I Siettos; Ioannis Evdokimidis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Arm movement metrics influence saccade metrics when looking and pointing towards a memorized target location.

Authors:  Emmanouil Kattoulas; Nikolaos Smyrnis; Asimakis Mantas; Ioannis Evdokimidis; Vassilis Raos; Adonis Moschovakis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Two independent sources of anisotropy in the visual representation of direction in 2-D space.

Authors:  Nikolaos Smyrnis; Asimakis Mantas; Ioannis Evdokimidis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Motor preparation in a memorised delay task.

Authors:  Kimberlee Jordan; Brian I Hyland; Jeffery R Wickens; J Greg Anson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: spatial and temporal factors.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Amplitude and direction errors in kinesthetic pointing.

Authors:  Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Paolo Viviani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.