Literature DB >> 23633723

Tobacco Industry Influence on the American Law Institute's Restatements of Torts and Implications for Its Conflict of Interest Policies.

Elizabeth Laposata1, Richard Barnes, Stanton Glantz.   

Abstract

The American Law Institute ("ALI") is a prestigious and influential organization that creates treatises on the current state of the law, including "Restatements" of case law that guide judicial decisions and legislation. This paper uses previously secret tobacco industry documents made available as the result of state and federal litigation against the industry to describe how the tobacco companies, acting both indirectly through their trade organization, the Tobacco Institute, and directly, using influential lawyers, quietly influenced the ALI's writing of the Restatements. The tobacco industry's ease of access to the ALI calls into question the Institute's independence, the preparation of major policy documents such as the Restatements, as well as the Institute's ability to monitor and control conflicts of interest. The ALI's conflict of interest policies lag behind comparable organizations such as the National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine, and are insufficient to protect Institute projects from significant outside influence. Because of the undisclosed influence of the tobacco industry over the ALI, courts and legislatures should not apply the principles embodied in the Restatements in tort cases against the tobacco companies for injuries suffered from tobacco use. Until the ALI implements strong conflict of interest policies to ensure independence from private-interest manipulation, courts and legislatures should not rely on Institute reports and recommendations as neutral scholarly summaries of the law that should guide judicial and legislative decision-making.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23633723      PMCID: PMC3637975     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Law Rev        ISSN: 0021-0552


  23 in total

1.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Section 8(c) of the proposed Restatement (Third) of Torts: is it really what the doctor ordered?

Authors:  J D Winchester
Journal:  Cornell Law Rev       Date:  1997-03

Review 3.  Snuffing out tobacco: the city of St. Cloud's attempt to ban tobacco use in the name of healthcare reform; can everything be a special need?

Authors:  Matthew A Swartz
Journal:  J Contemp Health Law Policy       Date:  2003

4.  The power of paperwork: how Philip Morris neutralized the medical code for secondhand smoke.

Authors:  Daniel M Cook; Elisa K Tong; Stanton A Glantz; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  The tobacco industry's worldwide ETS consultants project: European and Asian components.

Authors:  Joaquin Barnoya; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 3.367

Review 6.  Legislating "sound science": the role of the tobacco industry.

Authors:  Annamaria Baba; Daniel M Cook; Thomas O McGarity; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Tobacco industry efforts to defeat the occupational safety and health administration indoor air quality rule.

Authors:  Katherine Bryan-Jones; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Vital signs: current cigarette smoking among adults aged >or=18 years --- United States, 2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food?

Authors:  Kelly D Brownell; Kenneth E Warner
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  Tobacco industry sociological programs to influence public beliefs about smoking.

Authors:  Anne Landman; Daniel K Cortese; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  1 in total

1.  Tobacco industry attempts to frame smoking as a 'disability' under the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act.

Authors:  Yvette van der Eijk; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.