Literature DB >> 16025257

Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation.

Luis Lassaletta1, Alejandro Castro, Marta Bastarrica, Maria José de Sarriá, Javier Gavilán.   

Abstract

Most cochlear implant studies are focused on improvement of speech perception associated with implantation. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life changes in Spanish users. Thirty postlingually deaf patients fitted with a cochlear implant completed the Glasgow Benefit Inventory, a questionnaire dealing with communication abilities, and an open-ended questionnaire. The Glasgow Benefit Inventory revealed a positive effect in 93% of patients. The use of a cochlear implant significantly enhanced discrimination ability, telephone use and self-confidence. A high degree of satisfaction was achieved in all situations except with background noise. Ninety-six percent of patients would recommend the operation to a friend. A dramatic improvement in quality of life following cochlear implantation is revealed by a great majority of patients. The results cannot only be explained by enhancements to auditory perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16025257     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-005-0987-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  12 in total

1.  Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire.

Authors:  J B Hinderink; P F Krabbe; P Van Den Broek
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Cochlear implantation and change in quality of life.

Authors:  C E Faber; A M Grøntved
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  2000

3.  Cochlear implant patients and quality of life.

Authors:  P J Karinen; M J Sorri; T T Välimaa; K H Huttunen; H J Löppönen
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  2001

4.  Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults.

Authors:  Howard W Francis; Nelson Chee; Jennifer Yeagle; Andre Cheng; John K Niparko
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Subjective benefits reported by adult Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant users.

Authors:  B S Kou; D B Shipp; J M Nedzelski
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1994-02

6.  The benefits of cochlear implantation in the geriatric population.

Authors:  S B Waltzman; N L Cohen; W H Shapiro
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Changes in quality of life and the cost-utility associated with cochlear implantation in patients with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome.

Authors:  Bradford G Bichey; Jon M Hoversland; Michael K Wynne; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  C J Maillet; R S Tyler; H N Jordan
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-04

9.  Quality of life in hearing-impaired adults: the role of cochlear implants and hearing aids.

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; Robert F Labadie; Mary S Dietrich; David S Haynes
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy.

Authors:  K Robinson; S Gatehouse; G G Browning
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  13 in total

1.  How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Tyler P Ellis; Keith S Apfelbaum
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Quality of life and audiologic performance through the ability to phone of cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Cécile Rumeau; Julien Frère; Bettina Montaut-Verient; Alexis Lion; Gérome Gauchard; Cécile Parietti-Winkler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The effects of cochlear implantation on quality of life in the elderly.

Authors:  W Di Nardo; R Anzivino; S Giannantonio; L Schinaia; G Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Fine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Javier Galindo; Luis Lassaletta; Rosa Pérez Mora; Alejandro Castro; Marta Bastarrica; Javier Gavilán
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Suggested response criteria for phase II antitumor drug studies for neurofibromatosis type 2 related vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Scott R Plotkin; Chris Halpin; Jaishri O Blakeley; William H Slattery; D Bradley Welling; Susan M Chang; Jay S Loeffler; Gordon J Harris; A Gregory Sorensen; Michael J McKenna; Fred G Barker
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Parent versus child assessment of quality of life in children using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Andrea D Warner-Czyz; Betty Loy; Peter S Roland; Liyue Tong; Emily A Tobey
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Using the HISQUI29 to assess the sound quality levels of Spanish adults with unilateral cochlear implants and no contralateral hearing.

Authors:  Miryam Calvino; Javier Gavilán; Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado; Rosa M Pérez-Mora; Elena Muñoz; Jesús Díez-Sebastián; Luis Lassaletta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Long term results in late implanted adolescent and adult CI recipients.

Authors:  Ersilia Bosco; Maria Nicastri; Deborah Ballantyne; Marika Viccaro; Giovanni Ruoppolo; Alessandra Ionescu Maddalena; Patrizia Mancini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  The relationship between the speech perception and the degree of satisfaction among adult users of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fernanda Soares Granço; Nayara Freitas Fernandes; Marina Morettin; Orozimbo Alves Costa Filho; Maria Cecília Bevilacqua
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04

Review 10.  The Glasgow Benefit Inventory: a systematic review of the use and value of an otorhinolaryngological generic patient-recorded outcome measure.

Authors:  J Hendry; A Chin; I R C Swan; M A Akeroyd; G G Browning
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 2.597

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.