Literature DB >> 25527411

Quality of life and audiologic performance through the ability to phone of cochlear implant users.

Cécile Rumeau1, Julien Frère2,3, Bettina Montaut-Verient1, Alexis Lion4,5, Gérome Gauchard4, Cécile Parietti-Winkler1,4.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life (QoL), using general and cochlear implant (CI) specific questionnaires and to determine the relationship of phone ability with QoL, speech recognition abilities and tinnitus. Twenty-six adult volunteers with a post-lingual profound deafness, unilaterally implanted with a CI, were included in this study. All subjects had used a CI for at least 1 year. The Glasgow benefit inventory (GBI) and Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire (NCIQ) were administered to assess QoL. Speech recognition was tested using phonemic Lafon's lists. The subjective tinnitus severity scale (STSS) questionnaire was used to determine the effects of tinnitus. CI users were split into four groups according to their phone ability. There was an improvement in QoL after cochlear implantation. The NCIQ showed significant (p < 0.001) improvements in the total score and in all subdomains after CI. A significant relationship between phone ability, QoL and speech recognition was found. Improving phone ability led to higher QoL (p < 0.05) and speech recognition (p < 0.01) scores. The CI use decreased significantly the occurrence of tinnitus, but its severity was not correlated with QoL. Post-surgery assessment should include speech recognition measures and QoL evaluation. The NCIQ appeared more effective than the GBI in its ability to detect improvements in QoL. Assessing phone ability represents an easy and fast approach to evaluate hearing performances and QoL, and may reflect global outcomes of CI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audiometry; Cochlear implants; Phone ability; Quality of life; Tinnitus

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25527411     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3448-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  35 in total

1.  [Q.A.L.Y. index and assessment of cost efficiency of the cochlear implant in acquired profound deafness].

Authors:  C Fugain; M Ouayoun; B Meyer; C H Chouard
Journal:  Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac       Date:  2000-02

2.  Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire.

Authors:  J B Hinderink; P F Krabbe; P Van Den Broek
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Tinnitus severity measured by a subjective scale, audiometry and clinical judgement.

Authors:  J B Halford; S D Anderson
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  The impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life: the role of audiologic performance and variables.

Authors:  Anke Hirschfelder; Stefan Gräbel; Heidi Olze
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Psychological change over 54 months of cochlear implant use.

Authors:  J F Knutson; K T Murray; S Husarek; K Westerhouse; G Woodworth; B J Gantz; R S Tyler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Use of the telephone in prelingually deaf children with a multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  M Tait; T P Nikolopoulos; S Archbold; G M O'Donoghue
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Tinnitus suppression in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  M J Ruckenstein; C Hedgepeth; K O Rafter; M L Montes; D C Bigelow
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  Tinnitus and cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Nicola Quaranta; Sherryl Wagstaff; David M Baguley
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Quality of life in hearing-impaired adults: the role of cochlear implants and hearing aids.

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; Robert F Labadie; Mary S Dietrich; David S Haynes
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  New criteria of indication and selection of patients to cochlear implant.

Authors:  André L L Sampaio; Mercêdes F S Araújo; Carlos A C P Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-13
View more
  10 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire into Italian.

Authors:  F Ottaviani; E Iacona; V Sykopetrites; A Schindler; F Mozzanica
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  What to Do When Cochlear Implant Users Plateau in Performance: a Pilot Study of Clinician-guided Aural Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Kara Vasil; Jodi Baxter; Christin Ray
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Verbal Learning and Memory After Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults: Some New Findings with the CVLT-II.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Arthur Broadstock; Taylor Wucinich; Natalie Safdar; Kelly Miller; Luis R Hernandez; Kara Vasil; Lauren Boyce; Alexandra Davies; Michael S Harris; Irina Castellanos; Huiping Xu; William G Kronenberger; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Variability of word discrimination scores in clinical practice and consequences on their sensitivity to hearing loss.

Authors:  Annie Moulin; André Bernard; Laurent Tordella; Judith Vergne; Annie Gisbert; Christian Martin; Céline Richard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Balance versus hearing after cochlear implant in an adult.

Authors:  Oz Zur; Hadas Ben-Rubi Shimron; Gerry Leisman; Eli Carmeli
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-10-10

7.  Cochlear implantation as a treatment for single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss: a randomized controlled evaluation of cost-utility.

Authors:  Mathieu Marx; Nadège Costa; Benoit Lepage; Soumia Taoui; Laurent Molinier; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2019-02-04

8.  Poor Performer: A Distinct Entity in Cochlear Implant Users?

Authors:  Christiane Völter; Kirsten Oberländer; Imme Haubitz; Rebecca Carroll; Stefan Dazert; Jan Peter Thomas
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.213

9.  Effects of Unilateral Cochlear Implantation on Balance Control and Sensory Organization in Adult Patients with Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Cécile Parietti-Winkler; Alexis Lion; Bettina Montaut-Verient; Rémy Grosjean; Gérome C Gauchard
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss.

Authors:  Aline Faria de Sousa; Maria Inês Vieira Couto; Ana Claudia Martinho-Carvalho
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.