Literature DB >> 8483603

The benefits of cochlear implantation in the geriatric population.

S B Waltzman1, N L Cohen, W H Shapiro.   

Abstract

The deterioration of speech-understanding abilities in the aged that results from factors such as reduced speed and accuracy in processing has been well documented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the geriatric population could benefit from a cochlear implant, despite the possibility of reduced processing abilities. Twenty patients, ages 65 to 85 years, with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss received the Nucleus multichannel cochlear prosthesis at NYU Medical Center. All patients underwent extensive preoperative medical and audiologic assessments to determine candidacy. The surgical procedure was well-tolerated by all patients. Mean postoperative test results revealed significant improvements in both auditory performance and quality of life as a result of implant usage. These data support the concept that although a reduction in the processing of sensory stimulation might exist, the elderly can process a new auditory code delivered by means of a cochlear implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8483603     DOI: 10.1177/019459989310800404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  9 in total

1.  Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Luis Lassaletta; Alejandro Castro; Marta Bastarrica; Maria José de Sarriá; Javier Gavilán
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Partial withdrawal of deeply inserted cochlear electrodes: observations of two patients.

Authors:  Maria-Izabel Kos; Colette Boex; Jean-Philippe Guyot; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Cochlear implant rehabilitation in older adults: literature review and proposal of a conceptual framework.

Authors:  James H Clark; Jennifer Yeagle; Alicia I Arbaje; Frank R Lin; John K Niparko; Howard W Francis
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Bilateral effects of unilateral cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf cats.

Authors:  Jahn N O'Neil; Charles J Limb; Christa A Baker; David K Ryugo
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Bruna S S Mussoi; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Synaptic morphology and the influence of auditory experience.

Authors:  Jahn N O'Neil; Catherine J Connelly; Charles J Limb; David K Ryugo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Localized cell and drug delivery for auditory prostheses.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Hendricks; Jennifer A Chikar; Mark A Crumling; Yehoash Raphael; David C Martin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Monotic auditory processing disorder tests in the older adult population.

Authors:  L Clarke Cox; Sandra L McCoy; Patricia A Tun; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Is cochlear implantation a good treatment method for profoundly deafened elderly?

Authors:  Magdalena Lachowska; Agnieszka Pastuszka; Paulina Glinka; Kazimierz Niemczyk
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.458

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.