Literature DB >> 16022718

Engineering craniofacial scaffolds.

S J Hollister1, C Y Lin, E Saito, C Y Lin, R D Schek, J M Taboas, J M Williams, B Partee, C L Flanagan, A Diggs, E N Wilke, G H Van Lenthe, R Müller, T Wirtz, S Das, S E Feinberg, P H Krebsbach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop an integrated approach for engineering craniofacial scaffolds and to demonstrate that these engineered scaffolds would have mechanical properties in the range of craniofacial tissue and support bone regeneration for craniofacial reconstruction. EXPERIMENTAL VARIABLE: Scaffold architecture designed to achieve desired elasticity and permeability. Scaffold external shape designed to match craniofacial anatomy. OUTCOME MEASURE: Final fabricated biomaterial scaffolds. Compressive mechanical modulus and strength. Bone regeneration as measured by micro-CT scanning, mechanical testing and histology.
SETTING: Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Oral/Maxillofacial Surgery, and Oral Medicine, Pathology and Oncology at the University of Michigan.
RESULTS: Results showed that the design/fabrication approach could create scaffolds with designed porous architecture to match craniofacial anatomy. These scaffolds could be fabricated from a wide range of biomaterials, including titanium, degradable polymers, and degradable calcium phosphate ceramics. Mechanical tests showed that fabricated scaffolds had compressive modulus ranging 50 to 2900 MPa and compressive strength ranging from 2 to over 56 MPa, within the range of human craniofacial trabecular bone. In vivo testing of designed scaffolds showed that they could support bone regeneration via delivery of BMP-7 transduced human gingival fibroblasts in a mouse model. Designed hydroxyapatite scaffolds with pore diameters ranging from 400 to 1200 microns were implanted in minipig mandibular defects for 6 and 18 weeks. Results showed substantial bone ingrowth (between 40 and 50% at 6 weeks, between 70 and 80% at 18 weeks) for all scaffolds, with no significant difference based on pore diameter.
CONCLUSION: Integrated image-based design and solid free-form fabrication can create scaffolds that attain desired elasticity and permeability while fitting any 3D craniofacial defect. The scaffolds could be manufactured from degradable polymers, calcium phosphate ceramics and titanium. The designed scaffolds supported significant bone regeneration for all pore sizes ranging from 300 to 1200 microns. These results suggest that designed scaffolds are clinically applicable for complex craniofacial reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16022718     DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2005.00329.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  53 in total

1.  Tailor-made tricalcium phosphate bone implant directly fabricated by a three-dimensional ink-jet printer.

Authors:  Kazuyo Igawa; Manabu Mochizuki; Osamu Sugimori; Koutaro Shimizu; Kenji Yamazawa; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Kozo Nakamura; Tsuyoshi Takato; Ryouhei Nishimura; Shigeki Suzuki; Masahiro Anzai; Ung-il Chung; Nobuo Sasaki
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Craniofacial tissue engineering by stem cells.

Authors:  J J Mao; W V Giannobile; J A Helms; S J Hollister; P H Krebsbach; M T Longaker; S Shi
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Hierarchical polymeric scaffolds support the growth of MC3T3-E1 cells.

Authors:  Rosa Akbarzadeh; Joshua A Minton; Cara S Janney; Tyler A Smith; Paul F James; Azizeh-Mitra Yousefi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Uniform deposition of protein incorporated mineral layer on three-dimensional porous polymer scaffolds.

Authors:  Sharon Segvich; Hayes C Smith; Linh N Luong; David H Kohn
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.368

5.  Solute transport in cyclically deformed porous tissue scaffolds with controlled pore cross-sectional geometries.

Authors:  Jorn Op Den Buijs; Lichun Lu; Steven M Jorgensen; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Michael J Yaszemski; Erik L Ritman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Finite element predictions compared to experimental results for the effective modulus of bone tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by selective laser sintering.

Authors:  S Cahill; S Lohfeld; P E McHugh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  The effect of bone ingrowth depth on the tensile and shear strength of the implant-bone e-beam produced interface.

Authors:  M Tarala; D Waanders; J E Biemond; G Hannink; D Janssen; P Buma; N Verdonschot
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Effect of polycaprolactone scaffold permeability on bone regeneration in vivo.

Authors:  Anna G Mitsak; Jessica M Kemppainen; Matthew T Harris; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Experimental and computational characterization of designed and fabricated 50:50 PLGA porous scaffolds for human trabecular bone applications.

Authors:  Eiji Saito; Heesuk Kang; Juan M Taboas; Alisha Diggs; Colleen L Flanagan; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Pore architecture effects on chondrogenic potential of patient-specific 3-dimensionally printed porous tissue bioscaffolds for auricular tissue engineering.

Authors:  David A Zopf; Colleen L Flanagan; Anna G Mitsak; Julia R Brennan; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 1.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.