Literature DB >> 21395465

Effect of polycaprolactone scaffold permeability on bone regeneration in vivo.

Anna G Mitsak1, Jessica M Kemppainen, Matthew T Harris, Scott J Hollister.   

Abstract

Successful bone tissue engineering depends on the scaffold's ability to allow nutrient diffusion to and waste removal from the regeneration site, as well as provide an appropriate mechanical environment. Since bone is highly vascularized, scaffolds that provide greater mass transport may support increased bone regeneration. Permeability encompasses the salient features of three-dimensional porous scaffold architecture effects on scaffold mass transport. We hypothesized that higher permeability scaffolds will enhance bone regeneration for a given cell seeding density. We manufactured poly-ɛ-caprolactone scaffolds, designed to have the same internal pore design and either a low permeability (0.688×10(-7)m(4)/N-s) or a high permeability (3.991×10(-7)m(4)/N-s), respectively. Scaffolds were seeded with bone morphogenic protein-7-transduced human gingival fibroblasts and implanted subcutaneously in immune-compromised mice for 4 and 8 weeks. Micro-CT evaluation showed better bone penetration into high permeability scaffolds, with blood vessel infiltration visible at 4 weeks. Compression testing showed that scaffold design had more influence on elastic modulus than time point did and that bone tissue infiltration increased the mechanical properties of the high permeability scaffolds at 8 weeks. These results suggest that for polycaprolactone, a more permeable scaffold with regular architecture is best for in vivo bone regeneration. This finding is an important step toward the end goal of optimizing a scaffold for bone tissue engineering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21395465      PMCID: PMC3129612          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  26 in total

1.  Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Iwan Zein; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Kim Cheng Tan; Swee Hin Teoh
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Micro-CT-based screening of biomechanical and structural properties of bone tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Tim Van Cleynenbreugel; Jan Schrooten; Hans Van Oosterwyck; Jos Vander Sloten
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants.

Authors:  Bungo Otsuki; Mitsuru Takemoto; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Masashi Neo; Tadashi Kokubo; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  The correlation of pore morphology, interconnectivity and physical properties of 3D ceramic scaffolds with bone ingrowth.

Authors:  Anthony C Jones; Christoph H Arns; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Bruce K Milthorpe; Adrian P Sheppard; Mark A Knackstedt
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Effect of different particles on cell proliferation in polymer scaffolds using a solvent-casting and particulate leaching technique.

Authors:  Soo Won Suh; Ji Youn Shin; Jinhoon Kim; Jhingook Kim; Chung Hwan Beak; Dong-Ik Kim; Hojoong Kim; Seong Soo Jeon; In-Wook Choo
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Poly(propylene fumarate) bone tissue engineering scaffold fabrication using stereolithography: effects of resin formulations and laser parameters.

Authors:  Kee-Won Lee; Shanfeng Wang; Bradley C Fox; Erik L Ritman; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 6.988

7.  Distinct cell responses to substrates consisting of poly(ε-caprolactone) and poly(propylene fumarate) in the presence or absence of cross-links.

Authors:  Kan Wang; Lei Cai; Feng Hao; Xuemin Xu; Meizhen Cui; Shanfeng Wang
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 6.988

8.  In Vivo Characteristics of Premixed Calcium Phosphate Cements When Implanted in Subcutaneous Tissues and Periodontal Bone Defects.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Sugawara; Kenji Fujikawa; Satoshi Hirayama; Shozo Takagi; Laurence C Chow
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  2010-08-01

9.  Osteoblast growth and function in porous poly epsilon -caprolactone matrices for bone repair: a preliminary study.

Authors:  G Ciapetti; L Ambrosio; L Savarino; D Granchi; E Cenni; N Baldini; S Pagani; S Guizzardi; F Causa; A Giunti
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Scaffolds with a standardized macro-architecture fabricated from several calcium phosphate ceramics using an indirect rapid prototyping technique.

Authors:  C E Wilson; C A van Blitterswijk; A J Verbout; W J A Dhert; J D de Bruijn
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.896

View more
  32 in total

1.  Pore architecture effects on chondrogenic potential of patient-specific 3-dimensionally printed porous tissue bioscaffolds for auricular tissue engineering.

Authors:  David A Zopf; Colleen L Flanagan; Anna G Mitsak; Julia R Brennan; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 1.675

2.  Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Adsorption onto Poly-ɛ-caprolactone Better Preserves Bioactivity In Vitro and Produces More Bone In Vivo than Conjugation Under Clinically Relevant Loading Scenarios.

Authors:  Janki J Patel; Colleen L Flanagan; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 3.  Growth factor delivery: how surface interactions modulate release in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  William J King; Paul H Krebsbach
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Hydrogels That Allow and Facilitate Bone Repair, Remodeling, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Aaron R Short; Deepthi Koralla; Ameya Deshmukh; Benjamin Wissel; Benjamin Stocker; Mark Calhoun; David Dean; Jessica O Winter
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 6.331

5.  Assessment of decellularized pericardial extracellular matrix and poly(propylene fumarate) biohybrid for small-diameter vascular graft applications.

Authors:  Megan Kimicata; Jules D Allbritton-King; Javier Navarro; Marco Santoro; Takahiro Inoue; Narutoshi Hibino; John P Fisher
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 6.  3D Printing of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration Applications.

Authors:  Anh-Vu Do; Behnoush Khorsand; Sean M Geary; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 9.933

7.  Poly(propylene fumarate) reinforced dicalcium phosphate dihydrate cement composites for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Daniel L Alge; Jeffrey Bennett; Trevor Treasure; Sherry Voytik-Harbin; W Scott Goebel; Tien-Min Gabriel Chu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  Chitosan-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sheeny Lan Levengood; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 6.331

9.  Bilayer Implants: Electromechanical Assessment of Regenerated Articular Cartilage in a Sheep Model.

Authors:  Jan C Schagemann; Nicola Rudert; Michelle E Taylor; Sotcheadt Sim; Eric Quenneville; Martin Garon; Mathias Klinger; Michael D Buschmann; Hagen Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Computer aided-designed, 3-dimensionally printed porous tissue bioscaffolds for craniofacial soft tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  David A Zopf; Anna G Mitsak; Colleen L Flanagan; Matthew Wheeler; Glenn E Green; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.