Literature DB >> 30262359

Pore architecture effects on chondrogenic potential of patient-specific 3-dimensionally printed porous tissue bioscaffolds for auricular tissue engineering.

David A Zopf1, Colleen L Flanagan2, Anna G Mitsak2, Julia R Brennan3, Scott J Hollister4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the effect of auricular scaffold microarchitecture on chondrogenic potential in an in vivo animal model.
METHODS: DICOM computed tomography (CT) images of a human auricle were segmented to create an external anatomic envelope. Image-based design was used to generate 1) orthogonally interconnected spherical pores and 2) randomly interspersed pores, and each were repeated in three dimensions to fill the external auricular envelope. These auricular scaffolds were then 3D printed by laser sintering poly-l-caprolactone, seeded with primary porcine auricular chondrocytes in a hyaluronic acid/collagen hydrogel and cultured in a pro-chondrogenic medium. The auricular scaffolds were then implanted subcutaneously in rats and explanted after 4 weeks for analysis with Safranin O and Hematoxylin and Eosin staining.
RESULTS: Auricular constructs with two micropore architectures were rapidly manufactured with high fidelity anatomic appearance. Subcutaneous implantation of the scaffolds resulted in excellent external appearance of both anterior and posterior auricular surfaces. Analysis on explantation showed that the defined, spherical micropore architecture yielded histologic evidence of more robust chondrogenic tissue formation as demonstrated by Safranin O and Hematoxylin and Eosin staining.
CONCLUSIONS: Image-based computer-aided design and 3D printing offers an exciting new avenue for the tissue-engineered auricle. In early pilot work, creation of spherical micropores within the scaffold architecture appears to impart greater chondrogenicity of the bioscaffold. This advantage could be related to differences in permeability allowing greater cell migration and nutrient flow, differences in surface area allowing different cell aggregation, or a combination of both factors. The ability to design an anatomically correct scaffold that maintains its structural integrity while also promoting auricular cartilage growth represents an important step towards clinical applicability of this new technology.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3 Dimensional printing; Auricular reconstruction; Computer-aided design; Computer-aided manufacturing; Microtia; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30262359      PMCID: PMC6196359          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.07.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  21 in total

1.  Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints.

Authors:  S J Hollister; R D Maddox; J M Taboas
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  A novel method for biomaterial scaffold internal architecture design to match bone elastic properties with desired porosity.

Authors:  Cheng Yu Lin; Noboru Kikuchi; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Psychosocial outcome of patients after ear reconstruction: a retrospective study of 62 patients.

Authors:  Nigel Horlock; Esther Vögelin; Eileen T Bradbury; Adriaan O Grobbelaar; David T Gault
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering.

Authors:  Jessica M Williams; Adebisi Adewunmi; Rachel M Schek; Colleen L Flanagan; Paul H Krebsbach; Stephen E Feinberg; Scott J Hollister; Suman Das
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-01-23       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Tissue engineering: revolution and challenge in auricular cartilage reconstruction.

Authors:  Leila Nayyer; Kavi H Patel; Ali Esmaeili; Radoslaw A Rippel; Martin Birchall; Gregory O'Toole; Peter E Butler; Alexander M Seifalian
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  An image-based approach for designing and manufacturing craniofacial scaffolds.

Authors:  S J Hollister; R A Levy; T M Chu; J W Halloran; S E Feinberg
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Tissue-engineered cartilage constructs using composite hyaluronic acid/collagen I hydrogels and designed poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds.

Authors:  Elly Liao; Michael Yaszemski; Paul Krebsbach; Scott Hollister
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2007-03

8.  Tailoring the mechanical properties of 3D-designed poly(glycerol sebacate) scaffolds for cartilage applications.

Authors:  Jessica M Kemppainen; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 9.  Prosthetics in Facial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jaclyn Klimczak; Samuel Helman; Sameep Kadakia; Raja Sawhney; Manoj Abraham; Allison K Vest; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-05-22

10.  Ear reconstruction using a porous polyethylene framework and temporoparietal fascia flap.

Authors:  John F Reinisch; Sheryl Lewin
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 1.446

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Auricular reconstruction via 3D bioprinting strategies: An update.

Authors:  Ruby Dwivedi; Pradeep Kumar Yadav; Rahul Pandey; Divya Mehrotra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 2.  The Application of Cartilage Tissue Engineering with Cell-Laden Hydrogel in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hongsen Bi; Zhenmin Zhao; Guanhuier Wang; Xinling Zhang; Xi Bu; Yang An
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.451

Review 3.  Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology-The state of translation.

Authors:  Weston L Niermeyer; Cole Rodman; Michael M Li; Tendy Chiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-19

Review 4.  Three-Dimensional Printing Strategies for Irregularly Shaped Cartilage Tissue Engineering: Current State and Challenges.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Zhonghan Wang; He Liu; Jiaqi Liu; Ronghang Li; Xiujie Zhu; Ming Ren; Mingli Wang; Yuzhe Liu; Youbin Li; Yuxi Jia; Chenyu Wang; Jincheng Wang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-05

5.  Preclinical assessment of clinically streamlined, 3D-printed, biocompatible single- and two-stage tissue scaffolds for ear reconstruction.

Authors:  Julia R Brennan; Ashley Cornett; Brian Chang; Sarah J Crotts; Zahra Nourmohammadi; Isabelle Lombaert; Scott J Hollister; David A Zopf
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 6.  Auricular reconstruction: where are we now? A critical literature review.

Authors:  Sarah Humphries; Anil Joshi; William Richard Webb; Rahul Kanegaonkar
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.503

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.