RATIONALE: The reinforcing effects of stimulant drugs are modulated by behavioral demands following drug administration. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the reinforcing effects of modafinil, a drug with purportedly low abuse potential, under different behavioral demands using a modified progressive-ratio procedure. METHODS: The reinforcing effects of oral modafinil (0, 100, 200, and 400 mg) were assessed in six healthy adult volunteers under both performance and relaxation conditions. Performance sessions required volunteers to complete simple arithmetic problems for three 50-min blocks. Relaxation sessions required volunteers to sit quietly in a semi-reclined position in a darkened room for three 50-min blocks. Two sampling sessions (one performance and one relaxation session) always preceded two self-administration sessions (one performance and one relaxation session), and the order of performance and relaxation sessions was constant within a dose condition. RESULTS: Modafinil significantly increased break point and number of capsules earned on the modified progressive-ratio procedure as an increasing function of dose under the performance, but not the relaxation, condition. Modafinil produced comparable stimulant-like subjective ratings under both the performance and relaxation conditions. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present experiment demonstrate that modafinil can function as a reinforcer and that the reinforcing effects of modafinil are influenced by behavioral demands following drug administration, similar to those of other stimulant drugs.
RATIONALE: The reinforcing effects of stimulant drugs are modulated by behavioral demands following drug administration. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the reinforcing effects of modafinil, a drug with purportedly low abuse potential, under different behavioral demands using a modified progressive-ratio procedure. METHODS: The reinforcing effects of oral modafinil (0, 100, 200, and 400 mg) were assessed in six healthy adult volunteers under both performance and relaxation conditions. Performance sessions required volunteers to complete simple arithmetic problems for three 50-min blocks. Relaxation sessions required volunteers to sit quietly in a semi-reclined position in a darkened room for three 50-min blocks. Two sampling sessions (one performance and one relaxation session) always preceded two self-administration sessions (one performance and one relaxation session), and the order of performance and relaxation sessions was constant within a dose condition. RESULTS:Modafinil significantly increased break point and number of capsules earned on the modified progressive-ratio procedure as an increasing function of dose under the performance, but not the relaxation, condition. Modafinil produced comparable stimulant-like subjective ratings under both the performance and relaxation conditions. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present experiment demonstrate that modafinil can function as a reinforcer and that the reinforcing effects of modafinil are influenced by behavioral demands following drug administration, similar to those of other stimulant drugs.
Authors: V Deroche-Gamonet; M Darnaudéry; L Bruins-Slot; F Piat; M Le Moal; P V Piazza Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2002-04-20 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Sandra D Comer; Warren K Bickel; Richard Yi; Harriet de Wit; Stephen T Higgins; Galen R Wenger; Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Mary Jeanne Kreek Journal: Behav Pharmacol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.293
Authors: Nora D Volkow; Joanna S Fowler; Jean Logan; David Alexoff; Wei Zhu; Frank Telang; Gene-Jack Wang; Millard Jayne; Jacob M Hooker; Christopher Wong; Barbara Hubbard; Pauline Carter; Donald Warner; Payton King; Colleen Shea; Youwen Xu; Lisa Muench; Karen Apelskog-Torres Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Margaret Haney; Suzanne K Vosburg; Sandra D Comer; Richard W Foltin; Carl L Hart Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2008-12-04 Impact factor: 4.530