BACKGROUND: (±)-Modafinil has piqued interest as a treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and stimulant dependence. The R-enantiomer of modafinil might have unique pharmacological properties that should be further investigated. METHODS: (±)-Modafinil and its R-(-)- and S-(+)-enantiomers were synthesized and tested for inhibition of [(3)H] dopamine (DA) uptake and [(3)H]WIN 35428 binding in human dopamine transporter (DAT) wild-type and mutants with altered conformational equilibria. Data were compared with cocaine and the atypical DA uptake inhibitor, JHW 007. R- and S-modafinil were also evaluated in microdialysis studies in the mouse nucleus accumbens shell and in a cocaine discrimination procedure. RESULTS: (±)-, R-, and S-modafinil bind to the DAT and inhibit DA uptake less potently than cocaine, with R-modafinil having approximately threefold higher affinity than its S-enantiomer. Molecular docking studies revealed subtle differences in binding modes for the enantiomers. R-modafinil was significantly less potent in the DAT Y156F mutant compared with wild-type DAT, whereas S-modafinil was affected less. Studies with the Y335A DAT mutant showed that the R- and S-enantiomers tolerated the inward-facing conformation better than cocaine, which was further supported by [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]-methanethiosulfonate reactivity on the DAT E2C I159C. Microdialysis studies demonstrated that both R- and S-modafinil produced increases in extracellular DA concentrations in the nucleus accumbens shell less efficaciously than cocaine and with a longer duration of action. Both enantiomers fully substituted in mice trained to discriminate cocaine from saline. CONCLUSIONS: R-modafinil displays an in vitro profile different from cocaine. Future trials with R-modafinil as a substitute therapy with the potential benefit of cognitive enhancement for psychostimulant addiction are warranted.
BACKGROUND: (±)-Modafinil has piqued interest as a treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and stimulant dependence. The R-enantiomer of modafinil might have unique pharmacological properties that should be further investigated. METHODS: (±)-Modafinil and its R-(-)- and S-(+)-enantiomers were synthesized and tested for inhibition of [(3)H] dopamine (DA) uptake and [(3)H]WIN 35428 binding in humandopamine transporter (DAT) wild-type and mutants with altered conformational equilibria. Data were compared with cocaine and the atypical DA uptake inhibitor, JHW 007. R- and S-modafinil were also evaluated in microdialysis studies in the mouse nucleus accumbens shell and in a cocaine discrimination procedure. RESULTS: (±)-, R-, and S-modafinil bind to the DAT and inhibit DA uptake less potently than cocaine, with R-modafinil having approximately threefold higher affinity than its S-enantiomer. Molecular docking studies revealed subtle differences in binding modes for the enantiomers. R-modafinil was significantly less potent in the DATY156F mutant compared with wild-type DAT, whereas S-modafinil was affected less. Studies with the Y335ADAT mutant showed that the R- and S-enantiomers tolerated the inward-facing conformation better than cocaine, which was further supported by [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]-methanethiosulfonate reactivity on the DAT E2C I159C. Microdialysis studies demonstrated that both R- and S-modafinil produced increases in extracellular DA concentrations in the nucleus accumbens shell less efficaciously than cocaine and with a longer duration of action. Both enantiomers fully substituted in mice trained to discriminate cocaine from saline. CONCLUSIONS:R-modafinil displays an in vitro profile different from cocaine. Future trials with R-modafinil as a substitute therapy with the potential benefit of cognitive enhancement for psychostimulant addiction are warranted.
Authors: Beatriz A Rocha; Evan H Goulding; Laura E O'Dell; Andy N Mead; Nicole G Coufal; Loren H Parsons; Laurence H Tecott Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2002-11-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Suzanne K Vosburg; Carl L Hart; Margaret Haney; Eric Rubin; Richard W Foltin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Martin J Bobak; Matthew W Weber; Melissa A Doellman; Douglas R Schuweiler; Jeana M Athens; Steven A Juliano; Paul A Garris Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Gregory T Collins; Megan Abbott; Kayla Galindo; Elise L Rush; Kenner C Rice; Charles P France Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Brendan J Tunstall; Chelsea P Ho; Jianjing Cao; Janaína C M Vendruscolo; Brooke E Schmeichel; Rachel D Slack; Gianluigi Tanda; Alexandra J Gadiano; Rana Rais; Barbara S Slusher; George F Koob; Amy H Newman; Leandro F Vendruscolo Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 5.250