Literature DB >> 12927656

Reinforcing, subject-rated, and physiological effects of intranasal methylphenidate in humans: a dose-response analysis.

William W Stoops1, Paul E A Glaser, Craig R Rush.   

Abstract

The results of previously published reports suggest that oral methylphenidate has potential for abuse. An increase in insufflation of methylphenidate has been reported recently. To our knowledge, however, there are no published reports that examined the effects of intranasal methylphenidate. The purpose of this experiment was to characterize the reinforcing, subject-rated, and physiological effects of intranasal methylphenidate (0, 10, 20, and 30 mg). Eight volunteers (five males and three females) with recent histories of recreational stimulant use were recruited to participate in this experiment. Drug doses were administered in a double-blind fashion under medical supervision, but for safety purposes they were administered in ascending order. Intranasal methylphenidate increased the crossover point on the Multiple-Choice Questionnaire in a linear fashion, which suggests that intranasal methylphenidate functioned as a reinforcer. Intranasal methylphenidate also produced linear dose-dependent prototypical stimulant-like subjective effects (e.g. increases in ratings of Good Effects and High). Intranasal methylphenidate increased heart rate as a function of dose, but the magnitude of this effect was not clinically significant (i.e. average peak heart rate following administration of the highest dose was less than 82 beats per min). The results of this study suggest that across a range of doses, intranasal methylphenidate produces behavioral effects that are characteristic of abused stimulants. Future studies should test higher doses and directly compare the behavioral effects of intranasal methylphenidate to those of a prototypical abused stimulant (e.g. cocaine).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12927656     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(03)00131-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  23 in total

1.  Influence of acute bupropion pre-treatment on the effects of intranasal cocaine.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Joshua A Lile; Paul E A Glaser; Lon R Hays; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 2.  Agonist replacement therapy for cocaine dependence: a translational review.

Authors:  Craig R Rush; William W Stoops
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.808

3.  Oral methylphenidate establishes a conditioned place preference in rats.

Authors:  Thomas E Wooters; Matthew T Walton; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Comparison of the behavioral and cardiovascular effects of intranasal and oral d-amphetamine in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  Joshua A Lile; Shanna Babalonis; Cleeve Emurian; Catherine A Martin; Daniel P Wermeling; Thomas H Kelly
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  Disentangling the Social Context of Nonmedical Use of Prescription Stimulants in College Students.

Authors:  Timothy E Wilens; MaryKate Martelon; Amy Yule; Tamar A Kaminski; Colin Burke; Ty S Schepis; Sean E McCabe
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2020-05-20

6.  Relationship between oral D-amphetamine self-administration and ratings of subjective effects: do subjective-effects ratings correspond with a progressive-ratio measure of drug-taking behavior?

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Anna R Reynolds; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  Comparative Ethanol-Induced Potentiation of Stimulatory Responses to Dexmethylphenidate Versus Methylphenidate.

Authors:  Kennerly S Patrick; Arthur B Straughn; Owen T Reeves; Hilary Bernstein; Robert Malcolm
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.153

8.  Assessing methylphenidate preference in ADHD patients using a choice procedure.

Authors:  Emily MacDonald Fredericks; Scott H Kollins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Quantifying reinforcement value and demand for psychoactive substances in humans.

Authors:  Adrienne J Heinz; Todd C Lilje; Jon D Kassel; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Curr Drug Abuse Rev       Date:  2012-12

Review 10.  Clinical models of decision making in addiction.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Brent A Kaplan
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.