Literature DB >> 14962814

Discrimination between cases of hip fracture and controls is improved by hip structural analysis compared to areal bone mineral density. An ex vivo study of the femoral neck.

P Mayhew1, S Kaptoge, N Loveridge, J Power, H P J Kroger, M Parker, J Reeve.   

Abstract

In vivo bone densitometry is affected by measurement inaccuracies arising from the assumptions made about soft tissue and marrow composition. This study tested the hypothesis that section modulus (SM, a measure of bending resistance) when measured ex vivo, would discriminate cases of hip fracture from controls better than areal bone mineral density (aBMD). The biopsies were from (n = 22, female) subjects that had suffered an intracapsular hip fracture. The control material (n = 24, female) was from post-mortem subjects. Serial peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) 1-mm thick cross-sectional images of femoral neck previously embedded in methacrylate were obtained with the Densiscan 1000 pQCT densitometer and matched for lateral location. The image voxels were converted to units of bone mass, which were then used to derive the section modulus. The data were used to derive means from which receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves could be generated. The area under the curves (AUC) showed that discrimination between the fracture cases and controls was better for SM than aBMD [SM: AUC = 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.71, 0.96), aBMD: AUC = 0.70 (0.54, 0.85); P = 0.034]. To simulate the forces experienced during a sideways fall, the model's neutral axis was rotated by 210 degrees. The results for section modulus were predictable from those at 0 degrees (r(2) = 0.97). We conclude that biomechanical analysis of the distribution of bone within the femoral neck may offer a marked improvement in the ability to discriminate patients with an increased risk of intracapsular fracture. Progress towards implementing this form of analysis in clinical densitometry should improve its diagnostic value, but may depend in part on better image resolution and more accurate corrections for the variability between subjects in regional soft tissue composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14962814     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  6 in total

1.  Targeted exercises against hip fragility.

Authors:  R Nikander; P Kannus; P Dastidar; M Hannula; L Harrison; T Cervinka; N G Narra; R Aktour; T Arola; H Eskola; S Soimakallio; A Heinonen; J Hyttinen; H Sievänen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study.

Authors:  P Szulc; F Duboeuf; A M Schott; P Dargent-Molina; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Bone architecture and fracture.

Authors:  John D Currey
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Proximal femoral structure and the prediction of hip fracture in men: a large prospective study using QCT.

Authors:  Dennis M Black; Mary L Bouxsein; Lynn M Marshall; Steven R Cummings; Thomas F Lang; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Carrie M Nielson; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Effect of minodronic acid hydrate on hip geometry in Japanese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Masako Ito; Teruki Sone; Masao Fukunaga
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  DXA-based hip structural analysis of once-weekly bisphosphonate-treated postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

Authors:  S L Bonnick; T J Beck; F Cosman; M C Hochberg; H Wang; A E de Papp
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.507

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.