Literature DB >> 20857281

Smaller, weaker, and less stiff bones evolve from changes in subsistence strategy.

N C Nowlan1, K J Jepsen, E F Morgan.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We propose a computational model with which to examine the evolution of bone. Our results indicate that changes in subsistence strategy have influenced the evolution of bone growth and mechanoregulation, and predict that bone size, stiffness, and structural strength may decrease in future generations, bringing increased risk of fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis.
INTRODUCTION: Archeological data suggest that bone size and strength have decreased over evolution. We hypothesize that changing evolutionary pressures and levels of physical activity, both arising from changes in subsistence strategy, have affected the evolution of bone. We propose a computational model with which to examine the evolution of bone growth and mechanoregulation due to the transitions from hunter-gatherer to agricultural to modern lifestyles.
METHODS: The evolution of genes governing growth and mechanoregulation in a population of bones is simulated, where each individual is represented by a 2-D bone cross-section. Genetic variability is assumed to modulate growth through mechanoregulatory factors that direct periosteal expansion, endosteal expansion/infilling, and ash content accretion in response to strains incurred during walking.
RESULTS: The model predicts decreases in cortical area and section modulus (a measure of structural strength) and increases in maximum compressive strain over the course of the simulation, meaning evolution of smaller, less strong, and less stiff bones is predicted for the population average. The model predicts small but continued decreases in size, strength, and stiffness in modern populations, despite the absence of a strong evolutionary advantage to efficient bones during this phase.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results show that changing loading regimes and evolutionary pressures may have influenced the evolution of bone growth and mechanoregulation, and predict that bone size and strength may continue to decrease in future generations, bringing increased risk of fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20857281     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1390-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  29 in total

1.  Forces and moments telemetered from two distal femoral replacements during various activities.

Authors:  S J Taylor; P S Walker
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Early domesticated fig in the Jordan Valley.

Authors:  Mordechai E Kislev; Anat Hartmann; Ofer Bar-Yosef
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution.

Authors:  G N Duda; M Heller; J Albinger; O Schulz; E Schneider; L Claes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Young's moduli and shear moduli in cortical bone.

Authors:  H C Spatz; E J O'Leary; J F Vincent
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1996-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Bone quantity and quality in past populations.

Authors:  S C Agarwal; M D Grynpas
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1996-12

Review 6.  Mechanical determinants of bone form: insights from skeletal remains.

Authors:  C B Ruff
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.041

7.  Mechanobiologic influences in long bone cross-sectional growth.

Authors:  M C van der Meulen; G S Beaupré; D R Carter
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Prediction of bone adaptation using damage accumulation.

Authors:  P J Prendergast; D Taylor
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  Fundamental questions about genes, inactivity, and chronic diseases.

Authors:  Frank W Booth; Simon J Lees
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.107

10.  Fourier transform infrared imaging microspectroscopy and tissue-level mechanical testing reveal intraspecies variation in mouse bone mineral and matrix composition.

Authors:  Hayden-William Courtland; Philip Nasser; Andrew B Goldstone; Lyudmila Spevak; Adele L Boskey; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Combating osteoporosis and obesity with exercise: leveraging cell mechanosensitivity.

Authors:  Gabriel M Pagnotti; Maya Styner; Gunes Uzer; Vihitaben S Patel; Laura E Wright; Kirsten K Ness; Theresa A Guise; Janet Rubin; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Gracility of the modern Homo sapiens skeleton is the result of decreased biomechanical loading.

Authors:  Timothy M Ryan; Colin N Shaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Diametrical diseases reflect evolutionary-genetic tradeoffs: Evidence from psychiatry, neurology, rheumatology, oncology and immunology.

Authors:  Bernard J Crespi; Matthew C Go
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2015-09-09

4.  Evolutionary Genetic Signatures of Selection on Bone-Related Variation within Human and Chimpanzee Populations.

Authors:  Daryn A Stover; Genevieve Housman; Anne C Stone; Michael S Rosenberg; Brian C Verrelli
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.141

5.  BMD Loci Contribute to Ethnic and Developmental Differences in Skeletal Fragility across Populations: Assessment of Evolutionary Selection Pressures.

Authors:  Carolina Medina-Gómez; Alessandra Chesi; Denise H M Heppe; Babette S Zemel; Jia-Lian Yin; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Albert Hofman; Joan M Lappe; Andrea Kelly; Manfred Kayser; Sharon E Oberfield; Vicente Gilsanz; André G Uitterlinden; John A Shepherd; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Struan F A Grant; Oscar Lao; Fernando Rivadeneira
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 16.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.