N C Nowlan1, K J Jepsen, E F Morgan. 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, 110 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA. nowlann@tcd.ie
Abstract
UNLABELLED: We propose a computational model with which to examine the evolution of bone. Our results indicate that changes in subsistence strategy have influenced the evolution of bone growth and mechanoregulation, and predict that bone size, stiffness, and structural strength may decrease in future generations, bringing increased risk of fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION: Archeological data suggest that bone size and strength have decreased over evolution. We hypothesize that changing evolutionary pressures and levels of physical activity, both arising from changes in subsistence strategy, have affected the evolution of bone. We propose a computational model with which to examine the evolution of bone growth and mechanoregulation due to the transitions from hunter-gatherer to agricultural to modern lifestyles. METHODS: The evolution of genes governing growth and mechanoregulation in a population of bones is simulated, where each individual is represented by a 2-D bone cross-section. Genetic variability is assumed to modulate growth through mechanoregulatory factors that direct periosteal expansion, endosteal expansion/infilling, and ash content accretion in response to strains incurred during walking. RESULTS: The model predicts decreases in cortical area and section modulus (a measure of structural strength) and increases in maximum compressive strain over the course of the simulation, meaning evolution of smaller, less strong, and less stiff bones is predicted for the population average. The model predicts small but continued decreases in size, strength, and stiffness in modern populations, despite the absence of a strong evolutionary advantage to efficient bones during this phase. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results show that changing loading regimes and evolutionary pressures may have influenced the evolution of bone growth and mechanoregulation, and predict that bone size and strength may continue to decrease in future generations, bringing increased risk of fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis.
UNLABELLED: We propose a computational model with which to examine the evolution of bone. Our results indicate that changes in subsistence strategy have influenced the evolution of bone growth and mechanoregulation, and predict that bone size, stiffness, and structural strength may decrease in future generations, bringing increased risk of fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION: Archeological data suggest that bone size and strength have decreased over evolution. We hypothesize that changing evolutionary pressures and levels of physical activity, both arising from changes in subsistence strategy, have affected the evolution of bone. We propose a computational model with which to examine the evolution of bone growth and mechanoregulation due to the transitions from hunter-gatherer to agricultural to modern lifestyles. METHODS: The evolution of genes governing growth and mechanoregulation in a population of bones is simulated, where each individual is represented by a 2-D bone cross-section. Genetic variability is assumed to modulate growth through mechanoregulatory factors that direct periosteal expansion, endosteal expansion/infilling, and ash content accretion in response to strains incurred during walking. RESULTS: The model predicts decreases in cortical area and section modulus (a measure of structural strength) and increases in maximum compressive strain over the course of the simulation, meaning evolution of smaller, less strong, and less stiff bones is predicted for the population average. The model predicts small but continued decreases in size, strength, and stiffness in modern populations, despite the absence of a strong evolutionary advantage to efficient bones during this phase. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results show that changing loading regimes and evolutionary pressures may have influenced the evolution of bone growth and mechanoregulation, and predict that bone size and strength may continue to decrease in future generations, bringing increased risk of fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis.
Authors: Hayden-William Courtland; Philip Nasser; Andrew B Goldstone; Lyudmila Spevak; Adele L Boskey; Karl J Jepsen Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Gabriel M Pagnotti; Maya Styner; Gunes Uzer; Vihitaben S Patel; Laura E Wright; Kirsten K Ness; Theresa A Guise; Janet Rubin; Clinton T Rubin Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 43.330
Authors: Daryn A Stover; Genevieve Housman; Anne C Stone; Michael S Rosenberg; Brian C Verrelli Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 4.141
Authors: Carolina Medina-Gómez; Alessandra Chesi; Denise H M Heppe; Babette S Zemel; Jia-Lian Yin; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Albert Hofman; Joan M Lappe; Andrea Kelly; Manfred Kayser; Sharon E Oberfield; Vicente Gilsanz; André G Uitterlinden; John A Shepherd; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Struan F A Grant; Oscar Lao; Fernando Rivadeneira Journal: Mol Biol Evol Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 16.240