Literature DB >> 9094271

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do we get faster?

F Agachan1, J S Joo, M Sher, E G Weiss, J J Nogueras, S D Wexner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A variety of parameters can affect the outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. All consecutive laparoscopic colorectal procedures (LCP) were analyzed in an attempt to define an operative time curve for different categories of procedures. Additionally, impacts of case number and procedure type on length of procedure were assessed.
METHODS: Our computerized data system was reviewed for all patients who underwent LCP in a 4-year period. Parameters reviewed included age, sex, surgical indications, procedures performed, length of procedure, intraoperative and postoperative complications, incidence and causes for conversion, duration of postoperative ileus, and hospital stay.
RESULTS: Between August 1991 and December 1995, 175 patients with a mean age of 48.4 (range 15-88) years underwent LCP. Patients were divided chronologically into five consecutive groups. Procedures were classified as either basic or complex. Complex procedures were those in which there was either a fixed tumor, an abscess or fistula, or extensive intraabdominal adhesions from prior surgery. Complex procedures performed each year ranged from 37% to 66%. As well, the percentage of patients with adhesions increased from 17% in 1991 to 29% in 1995. Despite increased difficulty, the intraoperative complication rate fell significantly from 29% in 1991 to 8% in 1995 (p < 0.005). Additionally, the operative length decreased from a mean of 201 min in 1991 to a mean of 141 min in 1995 (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The rapid improvement in these parameters may reflect both ascents in the learning curve and change in type of procedure. Adhesions, due to prior surgery or inflammation making dissection tedious, is the most important technical factor which effects operation time (p < 0.001). However, despite increased complexity, operating time decreased, reflecting improved skills. Thus, the experienced laparoscopic surgeon can increase the spectrum of applications with expectations of shorter operations and lower complication rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9094271     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  39 in total

1.  Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy--a multi-dimensional analysis.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Anthony W I Lo; Sophie S F Hon; Simon S M Ng; Janet F Y Lee; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Does the learning curve during laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect costs?

Authors:  Ravi P Kiran; Hasan T Kirat; Ersin Ozturk; Daniel P Geisler; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Is laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery equal to open surgery? An evidence based perspective.

Authors:  Beat M Künzli; Helmut Friess; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-27

4.  Learning curve for standardized laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer under supervision: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masashi Ueno; Masatoshi Oya; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  MIS in the management of colon and rectal cancer: consensus meeting of the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada.

Authors:  Christopher M Schlachta; Shady Ashamalla; Andy Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  W Chen; E Sailhamer; D L Berger; D W Rattner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  J-C Kang; S-W Jao; M-H Chung; C-C Feng; Y-J Chang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Predicting conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Fellowship training may be an advantage.

Authors:  C M Schlachta; J Mamazza; R Grégoire; S E Burpee; K T Pace; E C Poulin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Minimally invasive surgery for diverticulitis.

Authors:  R S Turley; C R Mantyh; J Migaly
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Laparoscopic colorectal fellowship training programme : a 6-year experience in a university colorectal unit.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Tony W C Mak; Sophie S F Hon; Dennis K Y Ngo; Simon S M Ng; Janet F Y Lee; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.