Literature DB >> 19212737

[A new total knee arthroplasty with physiologically shaped surfaces. Part 2: First clinical results].

K-H Frosch1, H Nägerl, D Kubein-Meesenburg, J Buchholz, J Dörner, H Dathe, O Hellerer, C Dumont, K M Stürmer.   

Abstract

The human medial tibial plateau is concave, whereas the lateral tibial plateau is convex. In a normal knee, the convex femoral condyles roll and glide on the tibia during the standing phase of walking. The designs of most commercially available knee prostheses do not take this morphological feature into consideration. The novel design of the AEQUOS G1 knee replacement prosthesis is based on the natural anatomy of the knee joint, with a convex lateral tibia plateau and a sagittal offset of the medial and lateral compartments. Following extensive development and testing, initial clinical results of the AEQUOS G1 prosthesis in a mulitcenter study are presented. From Mai 2005 to March 2007, 158 patients in 4 clinics underwent total knee arthroplasty with the AEQUOS G1 and agreed to participate in the study. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up using a standardized protocol that included the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. After 3 months, 151 patients appeared for follow up appointments, after 6 months, 134, and after 12 months, 127. The mean range of motion preoperatively was 97.0 degrees (+/-19.9 degrees ) and 107.5 degrees (+/-15.9 degrees ) 12 months after surgery. The AKSS, as well as the modified OKS, significantly improved (p<0.0001) from preoperative scores of 98.8 (+/-35.8) and 37.3 (+/-6.9) points, respectively, to 165.8 (+/-34.1) and 21.9 (+/-7.8) points, preoperatively, and 12 months postoperatively. The VAS score significantly decreased (p<0.001) from 7.4 (+/-1.8) points preoperatively to 1.9 (+/-2.2) points 12 months postoperatively.One implant was revised because of arthrofibrosis and another due to patellar luxation. Two patients required revision because their implants revealed malalignement with ligamentous instability. No infections, aseptic loosening or other implant-specific complications were observed at this early follow-up. Good clinical results were observed at early follow-up with the AEQUOS G1 knee arthroplasty. However, longer follow-up is necessary for a general evaluation of the implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19212737     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-008-1551-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  37 in total

1.  Methodology for long-term wear testing of total knee replacements.

Authors:  P S Walker; G W Blunn; J P Perry; C J Bell; S Sathasivam; T P Andriacchi; J P Paul; H Haider; P A Campbell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  J B Stiehl; R D Komistek; J M Cloutier; D A Dennis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  International variation in hip replacement rates.

Authors:  H Merx; K Dreinhöfer; P Schräder; T Stürmer; W Puhl; K-P Günther; H Brenner
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Richard D Komistek; Mohamed R Mahfouz; Brian D Haas; James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The Oxford hip and knee outcome questionnaires for arthroplasty.

Authors:  P B Pynsent; D J Adams; S P Disney
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-02

Review 6.  [In vivo determination of patello-femoral separation and linear impulse forces].

Authors:  R D Komistek; D A Dennis; J A Mabe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Failure to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty may result in more knee pain and secondary surgery.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Venkat R Rapuri; Khaled J Saleh; Michael A Kuskowski; Peter F Sharkey; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Relative motion of a mobile bearing inlay after total knee arthroplasty--dynamic in vitro study.

Authors:  C Stukenborg-Colsman; S Ostermeier; K H Wenger; C J Wirth
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome.

Authors:  D R Diduch; J N Insall; W N Scott; G R Scuderi; D Font-Rodriguez
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Modification of the posterior cruciate ligament tension following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of the Genesis CR and LCS meniscal bearing prostheses.

Authors:  Thomas Siebel; Wolfram Käfer
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Early results of gender-specific posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing].

Authors:  P von Roth; G Matziolis; T Pfitzner; H O Mayr; T Klein; B Preininger; T Winkler; R Hube
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.087

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.