Literature DB >> 15972510

Protective properties of rifampin-resistant rough mutants of Brucella melitensis.

R Adone1, F Ciuchini, C Marianelli, M Tarantino, C Pistoia, G Marcon, P Petrucci, M Francia, G Riccardi, P Pasquali.   

Abstract

Vaccination against Brucella infections in animals is usually performed by administration of live attenuated smooth B. abortus strain S19 and B. melitensis strain Rev1. They are proven effective vaccines against B. abortus in cattle and against B. melitensis and B. ovis in sheep and goats, respectively. However, both vaccines have the main drawback of inducing O-polysaccharide-specific antibodies that interfere with serologic diagnosis of disease. In addition, they retain residual virulence, being a cause of abortion in pregnant animals and infection in humans. To overcome these problems, one approach is to develop defined rough mutant Brucella strains lacking O antigen of lipopolysaccharide. B. abortus rough strain RB51, a rifampin-resistant mutant of virulent strain B. abortus 2308, is used as a vaccine against B. abortus infection in cattle in some countries. However, RB51 is not effective in sheep, and there is only preliminary evidence that it is effective in goats. In this study, we tested the efficacies of six rifampin-resistant rough strains of B. melitensis in protecting BALB/c mice exposed to B. melitensis infection. The protective properties, as well as both humoral and cellular immune responses, were assessed in comparison with those provided by B. melitensis Rev1 and B. abortus RB51 vaccines. The results indicated that these rough mutants were able to induce a very good level of protection against B. melitensis infection, similar to that provided by Rev1 and superior to that of RB51, without inducing antibodies to O antigen. In addition, all B. melitensis mutants were able to stimulate good production of gamma interferon. The characteristics of these strains encourage further evaluation of them as alternative vaccines to Rev1 in primary host species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15972510      PMCID: PMC1168545          DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.7.4198-4204.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  38 in total

Review 1.  Brucellosis vaccines: past, present and future.

Authors:  Gerhardt G Schurig; Nammalwar Sriranganathan; Michael J Corbel
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 2.  Control of small ruminant brucellosis by use of Brucella melitensis Rev.1 vaccine: laboratory aspects and field observations.

Authors:  Menachem Banai
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Field validation of the use of RB51 as antigen in a complement fixation test to identify calves vaccinated with Brucella abortus RB51.

Authors:  R Adone; F Ciuchini; S Olsen
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2001-03

4.  Brucella abortus RB51 induces protection in mice orally infected with the virulent strain B. abortus 2308.

Authors:  Paolo Pasquali; Adone Rosanna; Claudia Pistoia; Paola Petrucci; Franco Ciuchini
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Evaluation of Brucella abortus phosphoglucomutase (pgm) mutant as a new live rough-phenotype vaccine.

Authors:  Juan Esteban Ugalde; Diego José Comerci; M Susana Leguizamón; Rodolfo Augusto Ugalde
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 6.  T cell immunity to brucellosis.

Authors:  S Yingst; D L Hoover
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 7.624

Review 7.  Rough vaccines in animal brucellosis: structural and genetic basis and present status.

Authors:  Ignacio Moriyón; María Jesús Grilló; Daniel Monreal; David González; Clara Marín; Ignacio López-Goñi; Raúl C Mainar-Jaime; Edgardo Moreno; José María Blasco
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  Comparison between immune responses and resistance induced in BALB/c mice vaccinated with RB51 and Rev. 1 vaccines and challenged with Brucella melitensis bv. 3.

Authors:  M E R Hamdy; S M El-Gibaly; A M Montasser
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-08-02       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Persistence of Brucella abortus strain 19 infection in adult cattle vaccinated with reduced doses.

Authors:  L A Corner; G G Alton
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.534

10.  Different responses of macrophages to smooth and rough Brucella spp.: relationship to virulence.

Authors:  María P Jiménez de Bagüés; Annie Terraza; Antoine Gross; Jacques Dornand
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  14 in total

1.  Extended safety and efficacy studies of the attenuated Brucella vaccine candidates 16 M(Delta)vjbR and S19(Delta)vjbR in the immunocompromised IRF-1-/- mouse model.

Authors:  A M Arenas-Gamboa; A C Rice-Ficht; Y Fan; M M Kahl-McDonagh; T A Ficht
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-12-14

2.  Evaluation of protection afforded by Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis unmarked deletion mutants exhibiting different rates of clearance in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  M M Kahl-McDonagh; T A Ficht
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  The Brucella melitensis M5-90 phosphoglucomutase (PGM) mutant is attenuated and confers protection against wild-type challenge in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Tiansen Li; Jing Zhang; Zhiqiang Li; Yan Zhang; Zhen Wang; Hanping Feng; Yuanzhi Wang; Chuangfu Chen; Hui Zhang
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Construction of an expression plasmid (vector) encoding Brucella melitensis outer membrane protein, a candidate for DNA vaccine.

Authors:  Fatemeh Vahedi; Elnaz Ghorbani; Tahereh Falsafi
Journal:  Rep Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2013-04

5.  Brucella melitensis 16MΔTcfSR as a potential live vaccine allows for the differentiation between natural and vaccinated infection.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Li; Junbo Zhang; K E Zhang; Qiang Fu; Zhen Wang; Tiansen Li; Hui Zhang; Fei Guo; Chuangfu Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  A potent Brucella abortus 2308 Δery live vaccine allows for the differentiation between natural and vaccinated infection.

Authors:  Junbo Zhang; Shuanghong Yin; Fei Guo; Ren Meng; Chuangfu Chen; Hui Zhang; Zhiqiang Li; Qiang Fu; Huijun Shi; Shengwei Hu; Wei Ni; Tiansen Li; Ke Zhang
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.422

7.  Progress in Brucella vaccine development.

Authors:  Xinghong Yang; Jerod A Skyberg; Ling Cao; Beata Clapp; Theresa Thornburg; David W Pascual
Journal:  Front Biol (Beijing)       Date:  2013-02-01

8.  Antigenic, immunologic and genetic characterization of rough strains B. abortus RB51, B. melitensis B115 and B. melitensis B18.

Authors:  Rosanna Adone; Michele Muscillo; Giuseppina La Rosa; Massimiliano Francia; Michela Tarantino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Potential mechanisms of attenuation for rifampicin-passaged strains of Flavobacterium psychrophilum.

Authors:  Karol Gliniewicz; Mark Wildung; Lisa H Orfe; Gregory D Wiens; Kenneth D Cain; Kevin K Lahmers; Kevin R Snekvik; Douglas R Call
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Brucellosis vaccines: assessment of Brucella melitensis lipopolysaccharide rough mutants defective in core and O-polysaccharide synthesis and export.

Authors:  David González; María-Jesús Grilló; María-Jesús De Miguel; Tara Ali; Vilma Arce-Gorvel; Rose-May Delrue; Raquel Conde-Alvarez; Pilar Muñoz; Ignacio López-Goñi; Maite Iriarte; Clara-M Marín; Andrej Weintraub; Göran Widmalm; Michel Zygmunt; Jean-Jacques Letesson; Jean-Pierre Gorvel; José-María Blasco; Ignacio Moriyón
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.