Literature DB >> 26622461

Brucella melitensis 16MΔTcfSR as a potential live vaccine allows for the differentiation between natural and vaccinated infection.

Zhiqiang Li1, Junbo Zhang1, K E Zhang1, Qiang Fu1, Zhen Wang1, Tiansen Li1, Hui Zhang1, Fei Guo2, Chuangfu Chen1.   

Abstract

Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that poses a serious threat to public health and safety. Although the live attenuated vaccines targeting brucellosis, such as M5-90, are effective, there are a number of drawbacks to their use. For example, the vaccines are unable to differentiate between the natural and vaccinated forms of the infection, and these vaccines have also been shown to cause abortion in pregnant animals. Therefore, a safer and more potent vaccine is required. In the present study, a B. melitensis 16M TcfSR promoter mutant (16MΔTcfSR) was constructed in an attempt to overcome these drawbacks. A TcfSR mutant was derived from B. melitensis 16M and tested for virulence and protection efficiency. Levels of immuoglobulin G (IgG), and cytokine production were determined. In addition, TcfS was assessed as a diagnostic marker for brucellosis. The survival capacity of the 16MΔTcfSR mutant was shown to be attenuated in the RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line and BALB/c mice, and the vaccination was shown to induce a high level of protective immunity in BALB/c mice. In addition, the 16MΔTcfSR vaccination elicited an anti-Brucella-specific IgG response and induced the secretion of interferon-γ. Thus, the TcfS antigen allowed for the serological differentiation between the natural and vaccinated infection in animals. In conclusion, the results demonstrated that the 16MΔTcfSR mutant was attenuated in murine macrophage cells and BALB/c mice; therefore, 16MΔTcfSR is a potential candidate for a live attenuated vaccine against B. melitensis infection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16MΔTcfSR; Brucella; vaccine

Year:  2015        PMID: 26622461      PMCID: PMC4533132          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2015.2619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  24 in total

Review 1.  Brucellosis.

Authors:  Georgios Pappas; Nikolaos Akritidis; Mile Bosilkovski; Epameinondas Tsianos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Characterization of the caprine model for ruminant brucellosis.

Authors:  P H Elzer; S D Hagius; D S Davis; V G DelVecchio; F M Enright
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 3.  Brucellosis vaccines: past, present and future.

Authors:  Gerhardt G Schurig; Nammalwar Sriranganathan; Michael J Corbel
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Brucella vaccines in wildlife.

Authors:  D S Davis; P H Elzer
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  An ELISA with Brucella lipopolysaccharide antigen for the diagnosis of B. melitensis infection in sheep and for the evaluation of serological responses following subcutaneous or conjunctival B. melitensis strain Rev 1 vaccination.

Authors:  M P Jiménez de Bagüés; C M Marín; J M Blasco; I Moriyón; C Gamazo
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Inactivation of formyltransferase (wbkC) gene generates a Brucella abortus rough strain that is attenuated in macrophages and in mice.

Authors:  Thaís Lourdes Santos Lacerda; Patrícia Gomes Cardoso; Leonardo Augusto de Almeida; Ilana Lopes Baratella da Cunha Camargo; Daniela Almeida Freitas Afonso; Cyntia Cardoso Trant; Gilson Costa Macedo; Eleonora Campos; Silvio L Cravero; Suzana P Salcedo; Jean-Pierre Gorvel; Sérgio Costa Oliveira
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Intradermal immunization with outer membrane protein 25 protects Balb/c mice from virulent B. abortus 544.

Authors:  Divya Goel; Rakesh Bhatnagar
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.407

8.  The 16MΔvjbR as an ideal live attenuated vaccine candidate for differentiation between Brucella vaccination and infection.

Authors:  Yufei Wang; Yaoxia Bai; Qing Qu; Jie Xu; Yanfen Chen; Zhijun Zhong; Yefeng Qiu; Tongkun Wang; Xinying Du; Zhoujia Wang; Shuang Yu; Simei Fu; Jing Yuan; Qing Zhen; Yaqing Yu; Zeliang Chen; Liuyu Huang
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Comparison between immune responses and resistance induced in BALB/c mice vaccinated with RB51 and Rev. 1 vaccines and challenged with Brucella melitensis bv. 3.

Authors:  M E R Hamdy; S M El-Gibaly; A M Montasser
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-08-02       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Brucella melitensis 16MΔhfq attenuation confers protection against wild-type challenge in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Junbo Zhang; Fei Guo; Chuangfu Chen; Zhiqiang Li; Hui Zhang; Yuanzhi Wang; Ke Zhang; Guoqing Du; Yuefeng Li; Jiangde Wang; Tong Jian; Zhen Wang
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.955

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of Brucellosis Vaccines: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Mohsen Heidary; Shirin Dashtbin; Roya Ghanavati; Marzie Mahdizade Ari; Narjess Bostanghadiri; Atieh Darbandi; Tahereh Navidifar; Malihe Talebi
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-07-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.