Literature DB >> 15971086

How painful are shockwave lithotripsy and endoscopic procedures performed at outpatient urology clinics?

Byong Chang Jeong1, Hyoung Keun Park, Cheol Kwak, Seong-June Oh, Hyeon Hoe Kim.   

Abstract

Our aim was to investigate the subjective pain felt by patients during shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and endoscopic procedures such as cystoscopy, retrograde ureteral stenting, retrograde pyelography (RGP), and ureteroscopic lithotripsy performed in an outpatient clinic, and to identify how severe pain during such procedures is. We estimated subjective pain in 984 patients after SWL (186), cystoscopy (489), retrograde ureteral stenting (127), RGP (97), and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (85) performed by a single expert in an outpatient clinic using a prospective questionnaire with a ten point visual analog scale between January 2001 and December 2003. There was no premedication in any procedure except ureteroscopic lithotripsy for which an intramuscular injection of analgesics (pethidine HCl 50 mg) was used. The pain scale score in SWL was 6.62+/-2.27, the highest among the procedures (P<0.05). Pain scores for endoscopies were 4.48+/-2.07 in retrograde ureteral stenting, 3.81+/-2.06 in ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 3.72+/-1.75 in RGP, and 3.08+/-1.95 in cystoscopy. In this study, we observed that patients feel most pain in SWL without anesthesia, and that pain during ureteroscopic lithotripsy under local anesthesia is not high, compared with other endoscopic procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15971086     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-005-0474-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  17 in total

1.  Use of patient-controlled analgesia in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  C M Chin; K P Tay; F C NG; P H Lim; H C Chng
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-06

2.  Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  G W Drach; S Dretler; W Fair; B Finlayson; J Gillenwater; D Griffith; J Lingeman; D Newman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Cocaine and lidocaine as topical urethral anesthetics.

Authors:  M J Pliskin; K J Kreder; P M Desmond; M L Dresner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  A comparison of anticipated pain before and pain rating after the procedure in patients who undergo cystourethroscopy.

Authors:  R Mark Ellerkmann; James S Dunn; Andrew W McBride; Lorraine G Kummer; Clifford F Melick; Alfred E Bent; Joan L Blomquist
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; E Schmiedt; D Jocham; W Brendel; B Forssmann; V Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Noninvasive anesthesia, analgesia and radiation-free extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for stones in the most distal ureter: experience with 165 patients.

Authors:  F R Jermini; H Danuser; A Mattei; F C Burkhard; U E Studer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Is general anaesthesia necessary for URS in women?

Authors:  F Yalçinkaya; H Topaloğlu; E Ozmen; S Unal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  The 6.9 F semirigid ureteroscope in clinical use.

Authors:  O Abdel-Razzak; D H Bagley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar: treatment results with 19,962 renal and ureteral calculi.

Authors:  T B Mobley; D A Myers; W B Grine; J M Jenkins; W R Jordan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Comparison of first generation (Dornier HM3) and second generation (Medstone STS) lithotriptors: treatment results with 13,864 renal and ureteral calculi.

Authors:  A S Cass
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

1.  Ureteroscopy under conscious sedation: A proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Kunal Jain; Ruben Blachman-Braun; Esha Jain; Amanda Eng; Brian Peters; Premal Patel
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.052

2.  Preventive effects of COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib on renal tubular injury induced by shock wave lithotriptor.

Authors:  Hyoung Keun Park; Hae Won Lee; Kwang Soo Lee; Jong Sun Choi; Byong Chang Jeong; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-12-01

3.  Pre-emptive tramadol could reduce pain after ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Ana Mimić; Nataša Denčić; Jelena Jovičić; Jelena Mirković; Otaš Durutović; Dragica Milenković-Petronić; Nebojša Lađević
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Reduction of pre-procedural anxiety for repeat sessions in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) reduces pain intensity: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Vethunan Tamalvanan; Retnagowri Rajandram; Shanggar Kuppusamy
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Flexible and rigid ureteroscopy in outpatient surgery.

Authors:  Abeni Oitchayomi; Arnaud Doerfler; Sophie Le Gal; Charles Chawhan; Xavier Tillou
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.