Literature DB >> 12861140

A comparison of anticipated pain before and pain rating after the procedure in patients who undergo cystourethroscopy.

R Mark Ellerkmann1, James S Dunn, Andrew W McBride, Lorraine G Kummer, Clifford F Melick, Alfred E Bent, Joan L Blomquist.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare anticipated pain before the procedure and actual pain rating after the procedure in female patients who undergo cystourethroscopy. STUDY
DESIGN: Eighty-seven consecutive female patients completed a 10-cm visual analog pain scale before and after cystourethroscopy. A 24F urethroscope was used initially to inspect the urethra and was followed by a systematic survey of the bladder with a 17F cystoscope that was lubricated with 2% lidocaine gel. The visual analog pain scale scores were evaluated for significance with the use of the Student t test and the Pearson correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: Visual analog pain scale analysis demonstrated a mean anticipated pain score of 3.75 cm before the procedure versus a mean pain rating score of 2.83 cm after the procedure (P <.05). Neither a history of previous cystoscopy (visual analog pain scale score, 3.03 vs 2.30 cm; P =.18) nor talking with someone about the procedure beforehand (visual analog pain scale score, 2.74 vs 2.89 cm; P =.76) influenced the lower pain rating after the procedure. There was no significant correlation between age, parity, body mass index, or presence of pelvic organ prolapse and anticipated or realized pain perception.
CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo cystourethroscopy consistently anticipate higher degrees of discomfort than they actually perceive during the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12861140     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of anxiety, pain, and embarrassment associated with cystoscopy and urodynamic testing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Xavier Biardeau; Ornella Lam; Van Ba; Lysanne Campeau; Jacques Corcos
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  How painful are shockwave lithotripsy and endoscopic procedures performed at outpatient urology clinics?

Authors:  Byong Chang Jeong; Hyoung Keun Park; Cheol Kwak; Seong-June Oh; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-06-22

3.  The effect of office based flexible and rigid cystoscopy on pain experience in female patients.

Authors:  Niek F Casteleijn; Jessica L Vriesema; Saskia P Stomps; Olav L W B van Balen; Erik B Cornel
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-01-04

4.  Anaesthesia of the posterior urethra and pain reduction during cystoscopy - a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sławomir Poletajew; Sylwia Bender; Paweł Pudełko; Marcin Łykowski; Tomasz Piecha; Bartosz Sutkowski; Piotr Radziszewski
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 1.195

5.  Anxiety in children undergoing VCUG: sedation or no sedation?

Authors:  David W Herd
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.