Literature DB >> 12131285

Noninvasive anesthesia, analgesia and radiation-free extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for stones in the most distal ureter: experience with 165 patients.

F R Jermini1, H Danuser, A Mattei, F C Burkhard, U E Studer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Spontaneous ureteral stone passage often causes severe renal colic, especially when the stone passes through the narrow ureteral orifice. In these situations noninvasive anesthesia-free, analgesia-free and radiation-free extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (Dornier Medical Systems, Marietta, Georgia) is a valuable tool. It can be performed at any time without needing any further patient preparation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 165 patients underwent ESWL using the Lithostar Ultra device (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Only ureteral calculi within 5 cm. of the ureterovesical junction were included in this study. Patients were treated while supine and stones were localized by ultrasound through the filled bladder without x-ray exposure. Treatment was started without anesthesia or analgesia and analgesics were administered only at patient request during treatment.
RESULTS: Of the patients 93% were treated without anesthesia or analgesia and 7% required a single intravenous dose of 25 mg. pethidine. Postoperatively renal colic developed in 40 patients (24%). In 4 cases (2.4%) renal drainage was required for analgesia resistant pain or obstructive pyelonephritis. On day 1 after ESWL 90% of the patients were stone-free or had fragments 2 mm. or less, while 10% had residual fragments 3 mm. or greater. Of all patients 7% were re-treated once. At 3 months postoperatively 129 of the 130 evaluable patients (99%) were stone-free.
CONCLUSIONS: ESWL of stones located in the most distal ureter using the Lithostar Ultra device is effective, safe and radiation-free. It is done without anesthesia and in most cases without analgesics. This simple and noninvasive procedure is an excellent first line treatment modality for prevesical stones and it represents a valid alternative to conservative management or invasive endoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12131285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

Review 1.  Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-05-29

2.  Characteristics and treatment outcome of patients requiring additional intravenous analgesia during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with Dornier Compact Delta Lithotriptor.

Authors:  Chi-Fai Ng; Trevor Thompson; David Tolley
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Selecting Treatment for Distal Ureteral Calculi: Shock Wave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Ojas D Shah; Brian R Matlaga; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

4.  How painful are shockwave lithotripsy and endoscopic procedures performed at outpatient urology clinics?

Authors:  Byong Chang Jeong; Hyoung Keun Park; Cheol Kwak; Seong-June Oh; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-06-22

5.  [Outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Prospective evaluation of 2937 cases].

Authors:  P J Bastian; H-P Bastian
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  The treatment of the reno-ureteral calculi by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL).

Authors:  E Ceban
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2012-06-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.