Literature DB >> 7630988

Evaluation of California's statewide implementation of enhanced perinatal services as Medicaid benefits.

C C Korenbrot1, A Gill, Z Clayson, E Patterson.   

Abstract

The authors evaluated enhanced perinatal services developed by public health specialists that were implemented statewide through specially certified Medicaid providers to find out whether they were as effective as those services originally tested in the public health agency's pilot project, and more effective than services from regular Medicaid providers. Multivariate logistic regression analyses yielded adjusted odds ratios of use of care and health outcome measures for the statewide services compared with both the pilot project and routine Medicaid care. Although women receiving the enhanced services implemented statewide did not return for prenatal visits as well as those in the pilot project, they did better than women with routine Medicaid providers. Women who kept at least the eight prenatal visits recommended by the Public Health Service in 1989 had risks of low weight births no different from those in the pilot project and significantly better than those for women with at least eight visits with routine Medicaid providers (adjusted odds ratio 0.70 with a 95 percent confidence interval from 0.54 to 0.91). Thus, there is evidence for the efficacy of the services, but additional improvement could be realized through improving the use of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7630988      PMCID: PMC1382091     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  8 in total

1.  Randomized trial of comprehensive prenatal care for low-income women: effect on infant birth weight.

Authors:  F J McLaughlin; W A Altemeier; M J Christensen; K B Sherrod; M S Dietrich; D T Stern
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Barriers to implementation of a prenatal care program for low income women.

Authors:  C L Miller; L H Margolis; B Schwethelm; S Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Determining more good than harm is not easy.

Authors:  P Cotton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-07-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Risk status and pregnancy outcome among medicaid recipients.

Authors:  B Schwethelm; L H Margolis; C Miller; S Smith
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Access to prenatal care following major Medicaid eligibility expansions.

Authors:  P Braveman; T Bennett; C Lewis; S Egerter; J Showstack
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Medicaid and pregnancy: issues in expanding eligibility.

Authors:  E M Howell; M R Ellwood
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1991 May-Jun

8.  Low-birth-weight rate reduced by the obstetrical access project.

Authors:  J A Lennie; J R Klun; T Hausner
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1987
  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Health promotion and psychosocial services and women's assessments of interpersonal prenatal care in Medicaid managed care.

Authors:  Carol C Korenbrot; Sabrina T Wong; Anita L Stewart
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-06

2.  The missing link: improving quality with a chronic disease management intervention for the primary care office.

Authors:  John Zweifler
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 3.  Outcomes of enhanced prenatal services for Medicaid-eligible women in public and private settings.

Authors:  L Simpson; C Korenbrot; J Greene
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Reduced risk of low weight births among indigent women receiving care from nurse-midwives.

Authors:  P F Visintainer; J Uman; K Horgan; A Ibald; U Verma; N Tejani
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Medicaid and preterm birth and low birth weight: the last two decades.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Anum; Sheldon M Retchin; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Ethnic disparity in the performance of prenatal nutrition risk assessment among Medicaid-eligible women.

Authors:  E Fuentes-Afflick; C C Korenbrot; J Greene
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  A randomized trial of augmented prenatal care for multiple-risk, Medicaid-eligible African American women.

Authors:  L V Klerman; S L Ramey; R L Goldenberg; S Marbury; J Hou; S P Cliver
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  A performance indicator of psychosocial services in enhanced prenatal care of Medicaid-eligible women.

Authors:  D S Wilkinson; C C Korenbrot; J Greene
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-09

9.  A Call to Revisit the Prenatal Period as a Focus for Action Within the Reproductive and Perinatal Care Continuum.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Kay Johnson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

10.  Lower rates of low birthweight and preterm births in the California Black Infant Health Program.

Authors:  Winnie O Willis; Clara H Eder; Suzanne P Lindsay; Gilberto Chavez; Shirley T Shelton
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.798

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.