Literature DB >> 15964865

Developing a standard short questionnaire for the assessment of patient satisfaction with out-of-hours primary care.

C Salisbury1, A Burgess, V Lattimer, D Heaney, J Walker, J Turnbull, H Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Governmental reviews of out-of-hours services in England and Scotland have recommended that a standard questionnaire should be used to assess patient satisfaction. This is important because of the rapid introduction of new forms of care.
OBJECTIVE: To produce a brief, reliable and valid measure of patient satisfaction for use by a wide variety of providers of out-of-hours primary care.
METHODS: The Short Questionnaire for Out-of-Hours care was designed and compared with a longer questionnaire which had been validated and used in earlier research. Questionnaires were sent to 1906 people contacting an out-of-hours GP co-operative. Three versions of the short questionnaire were used with different formats. Analysis compared the response rates, measurement properties, concurrent and construct validity of the short and long questionnaires, and of different versions of the short questionnaire. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the overall response rates obtained from the short or long questionnaires (45.7% versus 41.9%; P = 0.17). The effective response rate of questionnaires from which all satisfaction scales could be calculated was higher for the short questionnaire (43.0% versus 36.4%; P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in response rates or distribution of responses between different versions of the short questionnaire. There was moderate agreement between items on the short questionnaire and corresponding scales on the long questionnaire. Scores using the short questionnaire showed anticipated relationships with the age and sex of patients and with characteristics of how the service was delivered. The SQOC is valid and reliable for routine service use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15964865     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmi050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  16 in total

1.  The Patient Experiences Questionnaire for Out-of-Hours Care (PEQ-OHC): data quality, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Andrew M Garratt; Kirsten Danielsen; Oddvar Forland; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Patient and family experiences with accessing telephone cancer treatment symptom support: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Esther Green; Barbara Ballantyne; Myriam Skrutkowski; Angela Whynot; Lucie Tardif; Joy Tarasuk; Meg Carley
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Capturing users' experience of UK out-of-hours primary medical care: piloting and psychometric properties of the Out-of-hours Patient Questionnaire.

Authors:  J L Campbell; A Dickens; S H Richards; P Pound; M Greco; P Bower
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-12

4.  Instruments to assess patient satisfaction after teleconsultation and triage: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martina Allemann Iseli; Regina Kunz; Eva Blozik
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 5.  Patient satisfaction questionnaires for primary care out-of-hours services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew M Garratt; Kirsten Danielsen; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Patients' perspective of telephone visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jennifer Locke; Sender Herschorn; Sarah Neu; Laurence Klotz; Ron Kodama; Lesley Carr
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  The association between demographic factors, user reported experiences and user satisfaction: results from three casualty clinics in Norway.

Authors:  Kirsten Danielsen; Oyvind A Bjertnaes; Andrew Garratt; Oddvar Forland; Hilde Hestad Iversen; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Users' reports and evaluations of out-of-hours health care and the UK national quality requirements: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  John Campbell; Martin Roland; Suzanne Richards; Andy Dickens; Michael Greco; Peter Bower
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Testing survey methodology to measure patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: telephone versus postal survey.

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Emma Knowles; Jon Nicholl
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Different measures, different outcomes? Survey into the effectiveness of chronic pain clinics in a London tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Savan Shah; Alexandra C Ho; Bianca M Kuehler; Susan R Childs; Glyn Towlerton; Ian D Goodall; Carsten Bantel
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.