Dawn Stacey1,2, Esther Green3, Barbara Ballantyne4, Myriam Skrutkowski5, Angela Whynot6, Lucie Tardif5, Joy Tarasuk6, Meg Carley7. 1. School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1H 8M5. dstacey@uottawa.ca. 2. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1H 8L6. dstacey@uottawa.ca. 3. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Northeast Cancer Center, Health Sciences North, 41 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, Canada, P3E 5J1. 5. Cancer Care Mission, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3G 1A4. 6. Capital Health, 1276 South Park Street, Victoria Building, Halifax, NS, Canada, B3H 2Y9. 7. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1H 8L6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Assess patient and family member experiences with telephone cancer treatment symptom support. METHODS: Descriptive study guided by the Knowledge-to-Action Framework. Patients and family members who received telephone support for a cancer treatment symptom within the last month at one of three ambulatory cancer programs (Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec) were eligible. An adapted Short Questionnaire for Out-of-hours Care instrument was analyzed with univariate statistics. RESULTS: Of 105 participants, 83 % telephoned about themselves and 17 % for a family member. Participants received advice over the telephone (90 %) and were advised to go to emergency (13 %) and/or the clinic (9 %). Two left a message and were not called back. Participants were "very satisfied" with the manner of nurse or doctor (58 %), explanation about problem (56 %), treatment/advice given (54 %), way call was handled (48 %), getting through (40 %), and wait time to speak to a nurse or doctor (38 %). The proportion "dissatisfied" or "very dissatisfied" for the above items was 4, 5, 9, 11, 10, and 14 %, respectively. Suggestions were shorter call back time, weekend access to telephone support, more knowledgeable advice on self-care strategies, more education at discharge, and shared documentation on calls to avoid repetition and improve continuity. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients and family members who responded to the survey were satisfied with telephone-based cancer treatment symptom support. Programs could improve telephone support services by providing an estimated time for callback, ensuring that nurses have access to and use previous call documentation, and enhancing patient education on self-care strategies for managing and triaging treatment-related symptoms.
PURPOSE: Assess patient and family member experiences with telephone cancer treatment symptom support. METHODS: Descriptive study guided by the Knowledge-to-Action Framework. Patients and family members who received telephone support for a cancer treatment symptom within the last month at one of three ambulatory cancer programs (Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec) were eligible. An adapted Short Questionnaire for Out-of-hours Care instrument was analyzed with univariate statistics. RESULTS: Of 105 participants, 83 % telephoned about themselves and 17 % for a family member. Participants received advice over the telephone (90 %) and were advised to go to emergency (13 %) and/or the clinic (9 %). Two left a message and were not called back. Participants were "very satisfied" with the manner of nurse or doctor (58 %), explanation about problem (56 %), treatment/advice given (54 %), way call was handled (48 %), getting through (40 %), and wait time to speak to a nurse or doctor (38 %). The proportion "dissatisfied" or "very dissatisfied" for the above items was 4, 5, 9, 11, 10, and 14 %, respectively. Suggestions were shorter call back time, weekend access to telephone support, more knowledgeable advice on self-care strategies, more education at discharge, and shared documentation on calls to avoid repetition and improve continuity. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients and family members who responded to the survey were satisfied with telephone-based cancer treatment symptom support. Programs could improve telephone support services by providing an estimated time for callback, ensuring that nurses have access to and use previous call documentation, and enhancing patient education on self-care strategies for managing and triaging treatment-related symptoms.
Authors: Jane Booker; Anne Eardley; Richard Cowan; John Logue; James Wylie; Ann-Louise Caress Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: Merel L Kimman; Monique Mf Bloebaum; Carmen D Dirksen; Ruud Ma Houben; Philippe Lambin; Liesbeth J Boersma Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-04-30 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Ruth Lewis; Richard D Neal; Nefyn H Williams; Barbara France; Clare Wilkinson; Maggie Hendry; Daphne Russell; Ian Russell; Dyfrig A Hughes; Nicholas S A Stuart; David Weller Journal: J Adv Nurs Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.187
Authors: C Ludwig; J Renaud; L Barbera; M Carley; C Henry; L Jolicoeur; C Kuziemsky; A Patry; D Stacey Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: L A Jibb; D Stacey; M Carley; A Davis; I D Graham; E Green; L Jolicoeur; C Kuziemsky; C Ludwig; T Truant Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Kristof Cuppens; Christel Oyen; Aurélie Derweduwen; Anouck Ottevaere; Walter Sermeus; Johan Vansteenkiste Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Anna Cox; Grace Lucas; Afrodita Marcu; Marianne Piano; Wendy Grosvenor; Freda Mold; Roma Maguire; Emma Ream Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Hely Shah; Lisa Vandermeer; Fiona MacDonald; Gail Larocque; Shannon Nelson; Mark Clemons; Sharon F McGee Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 3.359