Literature DB >> 19105911

Users' reports and evaluations of out-of-hours health care and the UK national quality requirements: a cross sectional study.

John Campbell1, Martin Roland, Suzanne Richards, Andy Dickens, Michael Greco, Peter Bower.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National standards for delivery of out-of-hours services have been refined. Health service users' preferences, reports, and evaluations of care are of importance in a service that aims to be responsive to their needs. AIM: To investigate NHS service users' reports and evaluations of out-of-hours care in the light of UK national service quality requirements.
DESIGN: Cross sectional survey.
SETTING: Three areas (Devon, Cornwall, Sheffield) of England, UK.
METHOD: Participants were 1249 recent users of UK out-of-hours medical services. Main outcome measures were: users' reports and evaluations of out-of-hours services in respect of the time waiting for their telephone call to the service to be answered; the length of time from the end of the initial call to the start of definitive clinical assessment ('call back time'); the time waiting for a home visit; and the waiting time at a treatment centre.
RESULTS: UK national quality requirements were reported as being met by two-thirds of responders. Even when responders reported that they had received the most rapid response option for home visiting (waiting time of 'up to an hour'), only one-third of users reported this as 'excellent'. Adverse evaluations of care were consistently related to delays encountered in receiving care and (for two out of four measures) sex of patient. For 50% of users to evaluate their care as 'excellent', this would require calls to be answered within 30 seconds, call-back within 20 minutes, time spent waiting for home visits of significantly less than 1 hour, and treatment centre waiting times of less than 20 minutes.
CONCLUSION: Users have high expectations of UK out-of-hours healthcare services. Service provision that meets nationally designated targets is currently judged as being of 'good' quality by service users. Attaining 'excellent' levels of service provision would prove challenging, and potentially costly. Delivering services that result in high levels of user satisfaction with care needs to take account of users' expectations as well as their experience of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19105911      PMCID: PMC2605546          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X394815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  20 in total

Review 1.  Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients.

Authors:  E McColl; A Jacoby; L Thomas; J Soutter; C Bamford; N Steen; R Thomas; E Harvey; A Garratt; J Bond
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Self-reports of health care utilization compared to provider records.

Authors:  P L Ritter; A L Stewart; H Kaymaz; D S Sobel; D A Block; K R Lorig
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

Review 4.  Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care.

Authors:  Michel Wensing; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-19

Review 5.  The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  R Crow; H Gage; S Hampson; J Hart; A Kimber; L Storey; H Thomas
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care.

Authors:  R K McKinley; C Roberts
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-03

7.  Toward a theory of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  S U Linder-Pelz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Meeting patient expectations of care: the major determinant of satisfaction with out-of-hours primary medical care?

Authors:  R K McKinley; K Stevenson; S Adams; T K Manku-Scott
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey.

Authors:  Peter Bower; Martin Roland; John Campbell; Nicola Mead
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-01

10.  Patient-reported use of health service resources compared with information from health providers.

Authors:  Suzanne H Richards; Joanna Coast; Tim J Peters
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2003-11
View more
  10 in total

1.  Out-of-hours care: remuneration alone is no panacea.

Authors:  Susan Pullon; Lynn McBain
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Instruments to assess patient satisfaction after teleconsultation and triage: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martina Allemann Iseli; Regina Kunz; Eva Blozik
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Out-of-hours care: do we?

Authors:  John L Campbell; J Henry Clay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Streamline triage and manage user expectations: lessons from a qualitative study of GP out-of-hours services.

Authors:  Jennifer N Egbunike; Chris Shaw; Alison Porter; Lori A Button; Paul Kinnersley; Kerry Hood; Sue Bowden; Sue Bale; Helen Snooks; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Patient satisfaction with out-of-hours GP cooperatives: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Marleen Smits; Linda Huibers; Anita Oude Bos; Paul Giesen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.581

6.  Exploring patients' self-reported experiences of out-of-hours primary care and their suggestions for improvement: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ria Poole; Arla Gamper; Alison Porter; Jennifer Egbunike; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone triage of patients requesting same day consultations in general practice: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing nurse-led and GP-led management systems (ESTEEM).

Authors:  John L Campbell; Nicky Britten; Colin Green; Tim A Holt; Valerie Lattimer; Suzanne H Richards; David A Richards; Chris Salisbury; Rod S Taylor; Emily Fletcher
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Understanding why some ethnic minority patients evaluate medical care more negatively than white patients: a cross sectional analysis of a routine patient survey in English general practices.

Authors:  Nicola Mead; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-16

9.  Establishing the validity of English GP Patient Survey items evaluating out-of-hours care.

Authors:  Luke T A Mounce; Heather E Barry; Raffaele Calitri; William E Henley; John Campbell; Martin Roland; Suzanne Richards
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Development and evaluation of an "emergency access button" in Danish out-of-hours primary care: a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J F Ebert; L Huibers; F K Lippert; B Christensen; M B Christensen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.