Literature DB >> 20433404

The Patient Experiences Questionnaire for Out-of-Hours Care (PEQ-OHC): data quality, reliability, and validity.

Andrew M Garratt1, Kirsten Danielsen, Oddvar Forland, Steinar Hunskaar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate the Patient Experiences Questionnaire for Out-of-Hours Care (PEQ-OHC) in Norway.
DESIGN: Questionnaire development was based on a systematic literature review of existing questionnaires, interviews with users, and expert group consultation. Questionnaire testing followed a postal survey of users who had attended out-of-hours centres in the North, West, and South of Norway.
SETTING: Primary care out-of-hours services.
SUBJECTS: The questionnaire was pre-tested with 13 users and was then mailed to 542 users who had had telephone contact and/or had a consultation with one of three out-of-hours centres. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data quality, internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity.
RESULTS: The questionnaire was considered to have good content validity by the expert group. There were 225 (41.51%) respondents to the postal questionnaire. Levels of missing data at the item and scale level were acceptable. Principal component analysis supported the four scales of user experiences relating to telephone contact, doctor services, nursing services, and organization. Item-total correlations were all above 0.5 and Cronbach's alpha was above 0.80 for all scales. Statistically significant associations based on explicit hypotheses were evidence for the construct validity of the PEQ-OHC.
CONCLUSION: The development of the PEQ-OHC followed a rigorous process based on a systematic review, interviews with users, and an expert group which lend the questionnaire content validity. The PEQ-OHC has evidence for data quality, internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20433404      PMCID: PMC3442324          DOI: 10.3109/02813431003768772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  23 in total

1.  How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies.

Authors:  J Sitzia
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 2.  The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  R Crow; H Gage; S Hampson; J Hart; A Kimber; L Storey; H Thomas
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Out of hours primary care.

Authors:  L Hallam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-01-18

4.  Predictors of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  J L Jackson; J Chamberlin; K Kroenke
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Patients' assessments of the outcomes of primary care consultations.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care Suppl       Date:  1993

6.  The effect of health status on patients' satisfaction with out-of-hours care provided by a family doctor co-operative.

Authors:  L G Glynn; M Byrne; J Newell; A W Murphy
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  Reliability and validity of a new measure of patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care in the United Kingdom: development of a patient questionnaire.

Authors:  R K McKinley; T Manku-Scott; A M Hastings; D P French; R Baker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-01-18

8.  Out-of-hours service in Denmark: the effect of a structural change.

Authors:  B L Hansen; A Munck
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  An evaluation of a GP out-of-hours service: meeting patient expectations of care.

Authors:  Kate Thompson; Kader Parahoo; Brid Farrell
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish EUROPEP questionnaire on patient evaluation of general practice.

Authors:  Peter Vedsted; Ineta Sokolowski; Hanne N Heje
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.581

View more
  12 in total

1.  Instruments to assess patient satisfaction after teleconsultation and triage: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martina Allemann Iseli; Regina Kunz; Eva Blozik
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.711

2.  A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.

Authors:  Claudia Bull; Joshua Byrnes; Ruvini Hettiarachchi; Martin Downes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Perception and satisfaction of patients after telemedicine urology consultations: A matched analysis with physicians' perspective.

Authors:  Bruno Turcotte; Lynda Bélanger; Anne-Sophie Blais; Annie-Claude Blouin; Stéphane Bolduc; Amélie Bolduc-Mokhtar; Michel Bureau; Yves Caumartin; Jonathan Cloutier; Marie-Pier Deschênes-Rompré; Thierry Dujardin; Yves Fradet; Noémie Gaudreau; Louis Lacombe; Katherine Moore; Fannie Morin; Geneviève Nadeau; Sophie Paquet; Francis Simard; David Simonyan; Frédéric Soucy; Rabi Tiguert; Paul Toren; Michele Lodde; Frédéric Pouliot
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 2.052

4.  The association between demographic factors, user reported experiences and user satisfaction: results from three casualty clinics in Norway.

Authors:  Kirsten Danielsen; Oyvind A Bjertnaes; Andrew Garratt; Oddvar Forland; Hilde Hestad Iversen; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  The physician's self-evaluation of the consultation and patient outcome: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Gerd Carlsson Ahlén; Ronny K Gunnarsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.581

6.  The Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective.

Authors:  Hilde Hestad Iversen; Olaf Holmboe; Oyvind Andresen Bjertnæs
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Patient experiences questionnaire for interdisciplinary treatment for substance dependence (PEQ-ITSD): reliability and validity following a national survey in Norway.

Authors:  Mona Haugum; Hilde Hestad Iversen; Oyvind Bjertnaes; Anne Karin Lindahl
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Parent experiences of diabetes care questionnaire (PEQ-DC): reliability and validity following a national survey in Norway.

Authors:  Hilde Hestad Iversen; Ylva Helland; Oyvind Bjertnaes; Torild Skrivarhaug
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Validation and Adjustment of the Patient Experience Questionnaire (PEQ): A Regional Hospital Study in Norway.

Authors:  Seth Ayisi Addo; Reidar Johan Mykletun; Espen Olsen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The Norwegian patient experiences with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP): reliability and construct validity following a national survey.

Authors:  Olaf Holmboe; Hilde Hestad Iversen; Kirsten Danielsen; Oyvind Bjertnaes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.