| Literature DB >> 15958173 |
Siri Malm1, Sigmund Frigstad, Frode Helland, Kjetil Oye, Stig Slordahl, Terje Skjarpe.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is a novel method for assessing myocardial perfusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a very low-power real-time MCE for quantification of regional resting myocardial blood flow (MBF) velocity in normal human myocardium.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15958173 PMCID: PMC1184091 DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-3-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Figure 1The different coronary artery beds and their representation in myocardial segments of the LV apical views, given a balanced coronary circulation. LAD = left anterior descending artery; LCx = left circumflex artery; LV = left ventricle; RCA = right coronary artery. Courtesy of Asbjorn Stoylen, dept. of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Figure 2Some selected end-systolic images from destruction-replenishment sequences. A. 4-chamber view, B. 2-chamber view, C. Apical long-axis view.
Absolute values of segmental myocardial contrast replenishment rate, (s-1)
| Basal septum | 20 | 0.41 ± 0.11 | 0.63 ± 0.14 | 0.56 ± 0.17 | |
| Mid septum | 20 | 0.36 ± 0.12 | 0.46 ± 0.15 | 0.47 ± 0.16 | |
| Apical septum | 20 | 0.33 ± 0.14 | 0.43 ± 0.14 | 0.42 ± 0.18 | |
| Apical lateral | 18 | 0.29 ± 0.10 | 0.43 ± 0.18 | 0.30 ± 0.12 | |
| Mid lateral | 11 | 0.27 ± 0.11 | 0.44 ± 0.18 | 0.37 ± 0.12 | |
| Basal lateral | 9 | 0.32 ± 0.13 | 0.55 ± 0.12 | 0.37 ± 0.14 | |
| Basal inferior | 14 | 0.43 ± 0.17 | 0.59 ± 0.19 | 0.44 ± 0.12 | |
| Mid inferior | 15 | 0.36 ± 0.09 | 0.54 ± 0.11 | 0.46 ± 0.15 | |
| Apical inferior | 13 | 0.35 ± 0.10 | 0.43 ± 0.14 | 0.34 ± 0.15 | |
| Apical anterior | 6 | 0.34 ± 0.10 | 0.45 ± 0.15 | 0.60 ± 0.29 | |
| Mid anterior | 5 | 0.27 ± 0.18 | 0.31 ± 0.18 | 0.21 ± 0.15 | |
| Basal anterior | 6 | 0.24 ± 0.21 | 0.39 ± 0.11 | 0.35 ± 0.22 | |
| Basal inferolat. | 7 | 0.42 ± 0.14 | 0.69 ± 0.12 | 0.61 ± 0.17 | |
| Mid inferolat. | 11 | 0.36 ± 0.15 | 0.52 ± 0.16 | 0.40 ± 0.18 | |
| Apical inferolat. | 13 | 0.31 ± 0.13 | 0.42 ± 0.18 | 0.44 ± 0.16 | |
| Apical anterosept. | 18 | 0.31 ± 0.11 | 0.48 ± 0.23 | 0.33 ± 0.15 | |
| Mid anterosept. | 15 | 0.36 ± 0.15 | 0.41 ± 0.19 | 0.47 ± 0.11 | |
| Basal anterosept. | 12 | 0.45 ± 0.19 | 0.58 ± 0.20 | 0.48 ± 0.16 | |
Values are mean ± 1SD. N = number of study subjects in which myocardial contrast opacification of the current segment was regarded as feasible for quantification.
Figure 3ECG-triggered end-systolic analysis (EchoPAC PC™) of contrast replenishment in the LV apical long-axis view. Time-intensity plots are fitted to the exponential function A (1-eTypical attenuation artefact is seen in basal inferolateral wall. A = peak plateau signal intensity reflecting myocardial blood volume; B(C) = intercept at the origin; k (β) = rate of signal intensity rise (microbubble replenishment rate) reflecting myocardial blood flow velocity; LV = left ventricle.