Literature DB >> 15942735

Spatiotemporal interactions between audition and touch depend on hand posture.

Daniel Sanabria1, Salvador Soto-Faraco, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

We report two experiments designed to assess the consequences of posture change on audiotactile spatiotemporal interactions. In Experiment 1, participants had to discriminate the direction of an auditory stream (consisting of the sequential presentation of two tones from different spatial positions) while attempting to ignore a task-irrelevant tactile stream (consisting of the sequential presentation of two vibrations, one to each of the participant's hands). The tactile stream presented to the participants' hands was either spatiotemporally congruent or incongruent with respect to the sounds. A significant decrease in performance in incongruent trials compared with congruent trials was demonstrated when the participants adopted an uncrossed-hands posture but not when their hands were crossed over the midline. In Experiment 2, we investigated the ability of participants to discriminate the direction of two sequentially presented tactile stimuli (one presented to each hand) as a function of the presence of congruent vs incongruent auditory distractors. Here, the crossmodal effect was stronger in the crossed-hands posture than in the uncrossed-hands posture. These results demonstrate the reciprocal nature of audiotactile interactions in spatiotemporal processing, and highlight the important role played by body posture in modulating such crossmodal interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15942735     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2327-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Location of the polysensory zone in the precentral gyrus of anesthetized monkeys.

Authors:  M S Graziano; S Gandhi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multisensory auditory-somatosensory interactions in early cortical processing revealed by high-density electrical mapping.

Authors:  J J Foxe; I A Morocz; M M Murray; B A Higgins; D C Javitt; C E Schroeder
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-09

3.  Activation of the human posterior parietal and temporoparietal cortices during audiotactile interaction.

Authors:  R Gobbelé; M Schürmann; N Forss; K Juottonen; H Buchner; R Hari
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The timing and laminar profile of converging inputs to multisensory areas of the macaque neocortex.

Authors:  Charles E Schroeder; John J Foxe
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06

Review 5.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Cross-modal dynamic capture: congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  A comparison of auditory and visual apparent motion presented individually and with crossmodal moving distractors.

Authors:  Thomas Z Strybel; Argiro Vatakis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Factors influencing audiovisual fission and fusion illusions.

Authors:  Tobias S Andersen; Kaisa Tiippana; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-11

9.  Feeling what you hear: auditory signals can modulate tactile tap perception.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Marc O Ernst; Knut Drewing; Guillaume Bouyer; Vincent Maury; Abderrahmane Kheddar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Hearing cheats touch, but less in congenitally blind than in sighted individuals.

Authors:  Kirsten Hötting; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-01
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures.

Authors:  Alexandra M Fernandes; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-06-06

2.  Somatotopic dominance in tactile temporal processing.

Authors:  Shinobu Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Naoki Kawakami; Susumu Tachi; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Crossing the hands is more confusing for females than males.

Authors:  Michelle L Cadieux; Michael Barnett-Cowan; David I Shore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Remapping motion across modalities: tactile rotations influence visual motion judgments.

Authors:  Martin V Butz; Roland Thomaschke; Matthias J Linhardt; Oliver Herbort
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of visual stimuli on temporal order judgments of unimanual finger stimuli.

Authors:  Satoshi Shibuya; Toshimitsu Takahashi; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Neuronal oscillations and multisensory interaction in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; Chi-Ming Chen; Monica N O'Connell; Aimee Mills; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  The modulation of crossmodal integration by unimodal perceptual grouping: a visuotactile apparent motion study.

Authors:  Georgina Lyons; Daniel Sanabria; Argiro Vatakis; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Directional remapping in tactile inter-finger apparent motion: a motion aftereffect study.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Kunihiko Mabuchi; Susumu Tachi; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The effect of sound intensity on the audiotactile crossmodal dynamic capture effect.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.