Literature DB >> 7950869

Characterization of wear in composite material orthopaedic implants. Part II: The implant/bone interface.

K Albert1, R Schledjewski, M Harbaugh, S Bleser, R Jamison, K Friedrich.   

Abstract

Carbon fiber/PEEK polymer (C/PEEK) composite materials are being developed for use as orthopaedic implant materials. Wear is an issue of increasing importance in orthopaedic implants; particulate debris generated by the wearing of biomaterials may be a causal factor leading to osteolysis and implant loosening. Therefore, numerical and experimental studies were completed to characterize the wear of C/PEEK composite materials in comparison to current orthopaedic implant materials. Finite element analyses (FEA) of a composite material hip stem implanted in a femur and loaded at 890 N determined that peak contact stresses will occur at the proximal-medial and distal regions of the implant. These contact stresses were found to be below 1.0 MPa over most of the implant surface; however the peak stress in the proximal-medial region was 1.8 MPa and higher still at the distal portion of the stem. In vivo forces result in contact stress values up to 9.0 MPa. The composite implant exhibited 10-40% lower contact stresses in the distal region compared to a titanium-alloy implant of identical design. Composite material wear samples were slid against porous hydroxylapatite (HA) to simulate the stem/bone interface. An identical series of experiments was run for comparison to a current orthopaedic implant material--Ti6A14V titanium alloy. Two domains of motion were studied; a composite ring-on-HA disc large amplitude sliding wear test; and a composite pin-on-HA disc small amplitude fretting regimen. Nominal contact pressures during testing were 1.4 MPa and 7.6 MPa for sliding and fretting tests, respectively. Fretting and sliding abrasive wear tests resulted in the composite material exhibiting a lower wear rate than the titanium-alloy. The magnitude of the difference was greatly dependent on the contact pressures, sliding amplitudes, and counterface material properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7950869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng        ISSN: 0959-2989            Impact factor:   1.300


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Failure analysis of total knee replacement. Basics and methodological aspects of the damage analysis].

Authors:  R Bader; W Mittelmeier; E Steinhauser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  In Situ Sensor Advancements for Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  Luting Liu; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  The long-term mechanical integrity of non-reinforced PEEK-OPTIMA polymer for demanding spinal applications: experimental and finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Stephen J Ferguson; Judith M A Visser; Anne Polikeit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.