Literature DB >> 1593461

Task-dependent changes in the response of human wrist joints to mechanical disturbance.

F Doemges1, P M Rack.   

Abstract

1. Subjects sat with their right hands in a mould which was attached to the shaft of a servo-controlled motor. 2. There were two different tasks. In one, the subject attempted to maintain a constant wrist flexing force, while the motor imposed flexion-extension movements. In the other, the subject attempted to maintain a constant wrist position while the motor exerted variable flexion-extension forces. 3. The 'maintain force' task was punctuated by randomly timed ramp extension movements to test the stretch reflex activity. The 'maintain position' task was punctuated by force changes which were the same as those recorded during the ramp extensions mentioned above. In this way it was possible to test stretch reflexes with the same disturbance during the 'maintain force' and 'maintain position' tasks. 4. When, after some practice, subjects had become good at maintaining the constant force, later components of the stretch reflex (after 40 ms) were found to be smaller than when they were maintaining a constant position. 5. Attempts to maintain a constant position often involved co-activation of the wrist extensor muscles. This could be prevented by local anaesthesia of the radial nerve. The long-latency stretch reflex of the flexors was still task dependent after this had been done. 6. The roles of co-activation and of task-dependent reflex responses are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1593461      PMCID: PMC1176053          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  7 in total

1.  Differences in coordination of elbow flexor muscles in force tasks and in movement tasks.

Authors:  A A Tax; J J Denier van der Gon; C J Erkelens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Changes in the stretch reflex of the human first dorsal interosseous muscle during different tasks.

Authors:  F Doemges; P M Rack
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex.

Authors:  T R Nichols; J C Houk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements.

Authors:  G C Joyce; P M Rack; D R Westbury
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Superposition of motor programs--I. Rhythmic forearm movements in man.

Authors:  A G Feldman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  The tendon of flexor pollicis longus: its effects on the muscular control of force and position at the human thumb.

Authors:  P M Rack; H F Ross
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Dynamic tensile properties of the plantaris tendon of sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  R F Ker
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.312

  7 in total
  59 in total

1.  Stretch reflex gain in cat triceps surae muscles with compliant loads.

Authors:  Sophie J De Serres; David J Bennett; Richard B Stein
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Contributions of feed-forward and feedback strategies at the human ankle during control of unstable loads.

Authors:  James M Finley; Yasin Y Dhaher; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adaptive control of stiffness to stabilize hand position with large loads.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences.

Authors:  Yi Xu; Charles R Larson; Jay J Bauer; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Proprioceptive reaction times and long-latency reflexes in humans.

Authors:  C D Manning; S A Tolhurst; P Bawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Goal-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch response at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weiler; Paul L Gribble; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Long-latency reflexes of elbow and shoulder muscles suggest reciprocal excitation of flexors, reciprocal excitation of extensors, and reciprocal inhibition between flexors and extensors.

Authors:  Isaac Kurtzer; Jenna Meriggi; Nidhi Parikh; Kenneth Saad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Phase-dependent and task-dependent modulation of stretch reflexes during rhythmical hand tasks in humans.

Authors:  Ruiping Xia; Brian M H Bush; Gregory M Karst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Bilateral impairments in task-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch reflex following stroke.

Authors:  Randy D Trumbower; James M Finley; Jonathan B Shemmell; Claire F Honeycutt; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.