Literature DB >> 2226689

Differences in coordination of elbow flexor muscles in force tasks and in movement tasks.

A A Tax1, J J Denier van der Gon, C J Erkelens.   

Abstract

Motor-unit activity in m. biceps brachii, m. brachialis and m. brachioradialis during isometric contractions has been compared with motor-unit activity during slow voluntary (extension and flexion) movements made against external loads. During these slow movements the recruitment threshold of m. biceps motor units is considerably lower than it is during isometric contractions but the recruitment threshold of both m. brachialis and m. brachioradialis motor units is considerably higher. For all three elbow flexor muscles the motor-unit firing frequency seems to depend on the direction of movement: the firing frequency is higher during flexion movements (3 deg/s) and lower during extension movements (-3 deg/s) than during isometric contractions. The relative contribution of the biceps to the total exerted flexion torque during slow voluntary movements is estimated to increase from 36% to about 48% and that of the brachialis/brachioradialis is estimated to decrease from 57% to about 45% compared to the relative contribution of these muscles during isometric contractions. This difference in the relative contribution of the three major elbow flexor muscles is shown to be caused by differences in the central activation in force tasks and movement tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2226689     DOI: 10.1007/bf02423505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  11 in total

1.  Differences in central control of m. biceps brachii in movement tasks and force tasks.

Authors:  A A Tax; J J Denier van der Gon; C C Gielen; M Kleyne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Activation of human arm muscles during flexion/extension and supination/pronation tasks: a theory on muscle coordination.

Authors:  H A Jongen; J J Denier van der Gon; C C Gielen
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Cat hindlimb motoneurons during locomotion. III. Functional segregation in sartorius.

Authors:  J A Hoffer; G E Loeb; N Sugano; W B Marks; M J O'Donovan; C A Pratt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Coordination and inhomogeneous activation of human arm muscles during isometric torques.

Authors:  E J van Zuylen; C C Gielen; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Relation between isometric force and stimulus rate in cat's hindlimb motor units of different twitch contraction time.

Authors:  D Kernell; O Eerbeek; B A Verhey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Relation between location of a motor unit in the human biceps brachii and its critical firing levels for different tasks.

Authors:  B M ter Haar Romeny; J J van der Gon; C C Gielen
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Rapid ankle extension during paw shakes: selective recruitment of fast ankle extensors.

Authors:  J L Smith; B Betts; V R Edgerton; R F Zernicke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Changes in recruitment order of motor units in the human biceps muscle.

Authors:  B M ter Haar Romeny; J J Denier van der Gon; C C Gielen
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Plateau potentials in alpha-motoneurones induced by intravenous injection of L-dopa and clonidine in the spinal cat.

Authors:  B A Conway; H Hultborn; O Kiehn; I Mintz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Motoneurone task groups: coping with kinematic heterogeneity.

Authors:  G E Loeb
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  24 in total

1.  Functional significance of stiffness in adaptation of multijoint arm movements to stable and unstable dynamics.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Etienne Burdet; Rieko Osu; Mitsuo Kawato; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Age independent and position-dependent alterations in motor unit activity of the biceps brachii.

Authors:  B Harwood; D L Edwards; J M Jakobi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Modeling and simulating the neuromuscular mechanisms regulating ankle and knee joint stiffness during human locomotion.

Authors:  Massimo Sartori; Marco Maculan; Claudio Pizzolato; Monica Reggiani; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The impact of whole-hand vibration exposure on the sense of angular position about the wrist joint.

Authors:  Sasa Radovanovic; Scott Jason Day; Håkan Johansson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Task-dependent changes in the response of human wrist joints to mechanical disturbance.

Authors:  F Doemges; P M Rack
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Reflex responsiveness of a human hand muscle when controlling isometric force and joint position.

Authors:  Katrina S Maluf; Benjamin K Barry; Zachary A Riley; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Mandibular physiological tremor is reduced by increasing-force ramp contractions and periodontal anaesthesia.

Authors:  Paul F Sowman; Russell S A Brinkworth; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Dependence of autogenic and heterogenic stretch reflexes on pre-load activity in the human arm.

Authors:  J B Smeets; C J Erkelens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  The use of isometric tests of muscular function in athletic assessment.

Authors:  G J Wilson; A J Murphy
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Motor unit activity when young and old adults perform steady contractions while supporting an inertial load.

Authors:  Michael A Pascoe; Jeffrey R Gould; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.