Literature DB >> 15933270

Nursing home administrators' opinions of the nursing home compare web site.

Nicholas G Castle1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In November of 2002 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services publicly reported on a national basis the quality of nursing homes on the Nursing Home Compare (NHC) Web site. This study examines administrators' opinions of this initiative and whether it has fostered quality improvement. DESIGN AND METHODS: Data used in this investigation come from a questionnaire mailed to the administrators of 477 nursing homes. Three hundred and twenty-four responses were received, giving a response rate of 68%. Facilities were located in four states: Connecticut, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee.
RESULTS: Ninety percent of the administrators examined the NHC Web site, 51% stated that they would be using the information for quality improvement in the future, and 33% stated that they were using NHC information in quality-improvement initiatives. IMPLICATIONS: For NHC to influence quality as it is intended, nursing home quality-of-care initiatives are essential. Study results show that administrators are generally accepting of the NHC Web site, and some are using the information in quality initiatives.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15933270     DOI: 10.1093/geront/45.3.299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontologist        ISSN: 0016-9013


  9 in total

1.  Nursing home price and quality responses to publicly reported quality information.

Authors:  Jan P Clement; Gloria J Bazzoli; Mei Zhao
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Public reporting of nursing home quality of care: lessons from the United States experience for canadian policy discussion.

Authors:  Alison M Hutchinson; Kellie Draper; Anne E Sales
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-11

3.  Have Nursing Home Compare quality measure scores changed over time in response to competition?

Authors:  Nicholas G Castle; John Engberg; Darren Liu
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-06

4.  Is there evidence of cream skimming among nursing homes following the publication of the Nursing Home Compare report card?

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Heather Ladd; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Jacqueline S Zinn
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-06-02

5.  State focus on health care-associated infection prevention in nursing homes.

Authors:  Catherine C Cohen; Carolyn T A Herzig; Eileen J Carter; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Elaine L Larson; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Associations between published quality ratings of skilled nursing facilities and outcomes of medicare beneficiaries with heart failure.

Authors:  Kathleen T Unroe; Melissa A Greiner; Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Eric D Peterson; Lesley H Curtis
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.669

7.  Choosing a Nursing Home: What Do Consumers Want to Know, and Do Preferences Vary across Race/Ethnicity?

Authors:  Jennifer Gaudet Hefele; Andrea Acevedo; Laurie Nsiah-Jefferson; Christine Bishop; Yasmin Abbas; Ecaterina Damien; Candi Ramos
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards.

Authors:  David C Grabowski; Robert J Town
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Patients' experiences of the quality of long-term care among the elderly: comparing scores over time.

Authors:  Marloes Zuidgeest; Diana M J Delnoij; Katrien G Luijkx; Dolf de Boer; Gert P Westert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.