Literature DB >> 26867753

Choosing a Nursing Home: What Do Consumers Want to Know, and Do Preferences Vary across Race/Ethnicity?

Jennifer Gaudet Hefele1, Andrea Acevedo2, Laurie Nsiah-Jefferson2, Christine Bishop2, Yasmin Abbas2, Ecaterina Damien2, Candi Ramos2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify what consumers want to know about nursing homes (NHs) before choosing one and to determine whether information preferences vary across race/ethnicity. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Primary data were collected in Greater Boston (January 2013-February 2014) from community-dwelling, white, black, and Latino adults aged 65+ and 40-64 years, who had personal/familial experience with a NH admission or concerns about one. STUDY
DESIGN: Eleven focus groups and 30 interviews were conducted separately by race/ethnicity and age group. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Participants wanted detailed information on the facility, policies, staff, and residents, such as location, staff treatment of residents, and resident conditions. They wanted a sense of the NH gestalt and were interested in feedback/reviews from residents/families. Black and Latino participants were especially interested in resident and staff racial/ethnic concordance and facility cultural sensitivity. Latino participants wanted information on staff and resident language concordance.
CONCLUSIONS: Consumers want more information about NHs than what is currently available from resources like Nursing Home Compare. Report card makers can use these results to enhance their websites, and they should consider the distinct needs of different racial/ethnic groups. Future research should test methods for collecting and reporting resident and family feedback/reviews. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nursing homes; consumer information; public reporting; race/ethnicity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26867753      PMCID: PMC4874936          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  24 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?

Authors:  S Sofaer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Quality report cards and nursing home quality.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; William D Spector
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2003-04

3.  Designing a report card for nursing facilities: what information is needed and why.

Authors:  Charlene Harrington; Janis O'Meara; Martin Kitchener; Lisa Payne Simon; John F Schnelle
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2003-04

4.  Overview of significant changes in the Minimum Data Set for nursing homes version 3.0.

Authors:  Debra Saliba; Malia Jones; Joel Streim; Joseph Ouslander; Dan Berlowitz; Joan Buchanan
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.669

5.  Do trends in the reporting of quality measures on the nursing home compare web site differ by nursing home characteristics?

Authors:  Jacqueline Zinn; William Spector; Lillian Hsieh; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2005-12

6.  Context-based strategies for engaging consumers with public reports about health care providers.

Authors:  Dale Shaller; David E Kanouse; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 7.  Patient perceptions of the quality of health services.

Authors:  Shoshanna Sofaer; Kirsten Firminger
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  The association of doctor-patient race concordance with health services utilization.

Authors:  Thomas A LaVeist; Amani Nuru-Jeter; Kiesha E Jones
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.222

9.  Publication of quality report cards and trends in reported quality measures in nursing homes.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Heather Ladd; Jacqueline S Zinn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Impact of public reporting on quality of postacute care.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; R Tamara Konetzka; Elizabeth A Stuart; Edward C Norton; Daniel Polsky; Jeongyoung Park
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.734

View more
  5 in total

1.  New Evidence on What Works in Effective Public Reporting.

Authors:  Brent Sandmeyer; Irene Fraser
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Patients Are Not Given Quality-Of-Care Data About Skilled Nursing Facilities When Discharged From Hospitals.

Authors:  Denise A Tyler; Emily A Gadbois; John P McHugh; Renée R Shield; Ulrika Winblad; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Selecting a Skilled Nursing Facility for Postacute Care: Individual and Family Perspectives.

Authors:  Emily A Gadbois; Denise A Tyler; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Preference Importance Ratings among African American and White Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Nytasia M Hicks; Allison R Heid; Katherine M Abbott; Kendall Leser; Kimberly VanHaitsma
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.871

5.  In Search of Hospice Information: Consumer Information Available on Hospice Compare and Yelp.

Authors:  Anna N Rahman; Susan Enguidanos
Journal:  Palliat Med Rep       Date:  2020-04-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.