Literature DB >> 15931958

Estimation and mapping of wet and dry mercury deposition across northeastern North America.

Eric K Miller1, Alan Vanarsdale, Gerald J Keeler, Ann Chalmers, Laurier Poissant, Neil C Kamman, Raynald Brulotte.   

Abstract

Whereas many ecosystem characteristics and processes influence mercury accumulation in higher trophic-level organisms, the mercury flux from the atmosphere to a lake and its watershed is a likely factor in potential risk to biota. Atmospheric deposition clearly affects mercury accumulation in soils and lake sediments. Thus, knowledge of spatial patterns in atmospheric deposition may provide information for assessing the relative risk for ecosystems to exhibit excessive biotic mercury contamination. Atmospheric mercury concentrations in aerosol, vapor, and liquid phases from four observation networks were used to estimate regional surface concentration fields. Statistical models were developed to relate sparsely measured mercury vapor and aerosol concentrations to the more commonly measured mercury concentration in precipitation. High spatial resolution deposition velocities for different phases (precipitation, cloud droplets, aerosols, and reactive gaseous mercury (RGM)) were computed using inferential models. An empirical model was developed to estimate gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) deposition. Spatial patterns of estimated total mercury deposition were complex. Generally, deposition was higher in the southwest and lower in the northeast. Elevation, land cover, and proximity to urban areas modified the general pattern. The estimated net GEM and RGM fluxes were each greater than or equal to wet deposition in many areas. Mercury assimilation by plant foliage may provide a substantial input of methyl-mercury (MeHg) to ecosystems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15931958     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-004-6259-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  15 in total

1.  Do concepts about catchment cycling of methylmercury and mercury in boreal catchments stand the test of time? Six years of atmospheric inputs and runoff export at Svartberget, northern Sweden.

Authors:  Y H Lee; K H Bishop; J Munthe
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-10-09       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Total gaseous mercury in Quebec (Canada) in 1998

Authors: 
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-10-02       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Experimental evidence against diffusion control of Hg evasion from soils.

Authors:  Dale W Johnson; Jody A Benesch; Mae S Gustin; David S Schorran; Steven E Lindberg; James S Coleman
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Development and characterization of an annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent inorganic reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air.

Authors:  Matthew S Landis; Robert K Stevens; Frank Schaedlich; Eric M Prestbo
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Modeling the atmospheric transport and deposition of mercury to the Great Lakes.

Authors:  Mark Cohen; Richard Artz; Roland Draxler; Paul Miller; Laurier Poissant; David Niemi; Dominique Ratté; Marc Deslauriers; Roch Duval; Rachelle Laurin; Jennifer Slotnick; Todd Nettesheim; John McDonald
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 6.  Monitoring the response to changing mercury deposition.

Authors:  Robert P Mason; Michael L Abbott; R A Bodaly; O Russell Bullock; Charles T Driscoll; David Evers; Steven E Lindberg; Michael Murray; Edward B Swain
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Factors influencing mercury in freshwater surface sediments of northeastern North America.

Authors:  Neil C Kamman; Ann Chalmers; Thomas A Clair; Andrew Major; Richard B Moore; Stephen A Norton; James B Shanley
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Mercury and trace elements in cloud water and precipitation collected on Mt. Mansfield, Vermont.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Malcolm; Gerald J Keeler; Sean T Lawson; Timothy D Sherbatskoy
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2003-08

9.  Dynamic oxidation of gaseous mercury in the Arctic troposphere at polar sunrise.

Authors:  Steve E Lindberg; Steve Brooks; C J Lin; Karen J Scott; Matthew S Landis; Robert K Stevens; Mike Goodsite; Andreas Richter
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Pools and fluxes of mercury and methylmercury in two forested catchments in Germany.

Authors:  D Schwesig; E Matzner
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-10-09       Impact factor: 7.963

View more
  26 in total

1.  Mercury trends in fish from rivers and lakes in the United States, 1969-2005.

Authors:  Ann T Chalmers; Denise M Argue; David A Gay; Mark E Brigham; Christopher J Schmitt; David L Lorenz
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Bioaccumulation syndrome: identifying factors that make some stream food webs prone to elevated mercury bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Darren M Ward; Keith H Nislow; Carol L Folt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Physical controls on total and methylmercury concentrations in streams and lakes of the northeastern USA.

Authors:  James B Shanley; Neil C Kamman; Thomas A Clair; Ann Chalmers
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Patterns of mercury deposition and concentration in northeastern North America (1996-2002).

Authors:  Alan Vanarsdale; Jeri Weiss; Gerald Keeler; Eric Miller; Gille Boulet; Raynald Brulotte; Laurier Poissant
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Watershed nitrogen and mercury geochemical fluxes integrate landscape factors in long-term research watersheds at Acadia National Park, Maine, USA.

Authors:  J S Kahl; S J Nelson; I Fernandez; T Haines; S Norton; G B Wiersma; G Jacobson; A Amirbahman; K Johnson; M Schauffler; L Rustad; K Tonnessen; R Lent; M Bank; J Elvir; J Eckhoff; H Caron; P Ruck; J Parker; J Campbell; D Manski; R Breen; K Sheehan; A Grygo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Patterns of Hg bioaccumulation and transfer in aquatic food webs across multi-lake studies in the northeast US.

Authors:  Celia Y Chen; Richard S Stemberger; Neil C Kamman; Brandon M Mayes; Carol L Folt
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Altered gill morphology in benthic macroinvertebrates from mercury enriched streams in the Neversink Reservoir Watershed, New York.

Authors:  Kathleen M Skinner; Jessica D Bennett
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Rapid, efficient growth reduces mercury concentrations in stream-dwelling Atlantic salmon.

Authors:  Darren M Ward; Keith H Nislow; Celia Y Chen; Carol L Folt
Journal:  Trans Am Fish Soc       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 1.861

9.  Characterization and speciation of mercury in mosses and lichens from the high-altitude Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Jun-Juan Shao; Cheng-Bin Liu; Qing-Hua Zhang; Jian-Jie Fu; Rui-Qiang Yang; Jian-Bo Shi; Yong Cai; Gui-Bin Jiang
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.609

10.  Mercury bioaccumulation and trophic transfer in the terrestrial food web of a montane forest.

Authors:  Christopher C Rimmer; Eric K Miller; Kent P McFarland; Robert J Taylor; Steven D Faccio
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.