Literature DB >> 20535551

Mercury trends in fish from rivers and lakes in the United States, 1969-2005.

Ann T Chalmers1, Denise M Argue, David A Gay, Mark E Brigham, Christopher J Schmitt, David L Lorenz.   

Abstract

A national dataset on concentrations of mercury in fish, compiled mainly from state and federal monitoring programs, was used to evaluate trends in mercury (Hg) in fish from US rivers and lakes. Trends were analyzed on data aggregated by site and by state, using samples of the same fish species and tissue type, and using fish of similar lengths. Site-based trends were evaluated from 1969 to 2005, but focused on a subset of the data from 1969 to 1987. Data aggregated by state were used to evaluate trends in fish Hg concentrations from 1988 to 2005. In addition, the most recent Hg fish data (1996-2005) were compared to wet Hg deposition data from the Mercury Deposition Network (MDN) over the same period. Downward trends in Hg concentrations in fish from data collected during 1969-1987 exceeded upward trends by a ratio of 6 to 1. Declining Hg accumulation rates in sediment and peat cores reported by many studies during the 1970s and 1980s correspond with the period when the most downward trends in fish Hg concentrations occurred. Downward Hg trends in both sediment cores and fish were also consistent with the implementation of stricter regulatory controls of direct releases of Hg to the atmosphere and surface waters during the same period. The southeastern USA had more upward Hg trends in fish than other regions for both site and state aggregated data. Upward Hg trends in fish from the southeastern USA were associated with increases in wet deposition in the region and may be attributed to a greater influence of global atmospheric Hg emissions in the southeastern USA. No significant trends were found in 62% of the fish species from six states from 1996 to 2005. A lack of Hg trends in fish in the more recent data was consistent with the lack of trends in wet Hg deposition at MDN sites and with relatively constant global emissions during the same time period. Although few significant trends were observed in the more recent Hg concentrations in fish, it is anticipated that Hg concentrations in fish will respond to changes in atmospheric Hg deposition, however, the magnitude and timing of the response is uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20535551     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1504-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  29 in total

1.  Tests of the fidelity of lake sediment core records of mercury deposition to known histories of mercury contamination.

Authors:  W L Lockhart; R W Macdonald; P M Outridge; P Wilkinson; J B DeLaronde; J W Rudd
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-10-09       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Mercury and lead budgets for Lochnagar, a Scottish mountain lake and its catchment.

Authors:  Handong Yang; Neil L Rose; Richard W Battarbee; John F Boyle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Modeling the atmospheric transport and deposition of mercury to the Great Lakes.

Authors:  Mark Cohen; Richard Artz; Roland Draxler; Paul Miller; Laurier Poissant; David Niemi; Dominique Ratté; Marc Deslauriers; Roch Duval; Rachelle Laurin; Jennifer Slotnick; Todd Nettesheim; John McDonald
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  High plankton densities reduce mercury biomagnification.

Authors:  Celia Y Chen; Carol L Folt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Methylmercury in mosquitoes related to atmospheric mercury deposition and contamination.

Authors:  Chad R Hammerschmidt; William F Fitzgerald
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Effect of loading rate on the fate of mercury in littoral mesocosms.

Authors:  Diane M Orihel; Michael J Paterson; Cynthia C Gilmour; R A Bodaly; Paul J Blanchfield; Holger Hintelmann; Reed C Harris; John W M Rudd
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Methylmercury in freshwater fish linked to atmospheric mercury deposition.

Authors:  Chad R Hammerschmid; William F Fitzgerald
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Time trends of methylmercury in walleye in northern Wisconsin: a hierarchical Bayesian analysis.

Authors:  Eric R Madsen; Hal S Stern
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  National contaminant biomonitoring program: Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, selenium, and zinc in U.S. Freshwater Fish, 1976-1984.

Authors:  C J Schmitt; W G Brumbaugh
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Mercury in soils, lakes, and fish in Voyageurs National Park (Minnesota): importance of atmospheric deposition and ecosystem factors.

Authors:  J G Wiener; B C Knights; M B Sandheinrich; J D Jeremiason; M E Brigham; D R Engstrom; L G Woodruff; W F Cannon; S J Balogh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Single and combined metal contamination in coastal environments in China: current status and potential ecological risk evaluation.

Authors:  Romana Manzoor; Tingwan Zhang; Xuejiao Zhang; Min Wang; Jin-Fen Pan; Zhumei Wang; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Half a century of changing mercury levels in Swedish freshwater fish.

Authors:  Staffan Akerblom; Anders Bignert; Markus Meili; Lars Sonesten; Marcus Sundbom
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Potential contributions of dissolved organic matter to monomethylmercury distributions in temperate reservoirs as revealed by fluorescence spectroscopy.

Authors:  Seam Noh; Jihee Kim; Jin Hur; Yongseok Hong; Seunghee Han
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Metal contamination of river otters in North Carolina.

Authors:  Charles W Sanders; Krishna Pacifici; George R Hess; Colleen Olfenbuttel; Christopher S DePerno
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Distributions and determinants of mercury concentrations in toenails among American young adults: the CARDIA Trace Element Study.

Authors:  Pengcheng Xun; Kiang Liu; J Steve Morris; Joanne M Jordan; Ka He
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  No relationship found between mercury and lead concentrations in muscle and scales of chub Squalius cephalus L.

Authors:  Zdenka Valová; Hana Hudcová; Kevin Roche; Jana Svobodová; Ilja Bernardová; Pavel Jurajda
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 7.  Bioaccumulation of metals in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) from water bodies of Anatolia (Turkey): a review with implications for fisheries and human food consumption.

Authors:  Lorenzo Vilizzi; Ali Serhan Tarkan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 8.  Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) as A Sentinel for Exposure to Mercury in Humans: Closing the Loop.

Authors:  John S Reif; Adam M Schaefer; Gregory D Bossart
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2015-11-12

9.  The influence of fish length on tissue mercury dynamics: implications for natural resource management and human health risk.

Authors:  Dana K Sackett; W Gregory Cope; James A Rice; D Derek Aday
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Mercury evasion from a boreal peatland shortens the timeline for recovery from legacy pollution.

Authors:  Stefan Osterwalder; Kevin Bishop; Christine Alewell; Johannes Fritsche; Hjalmar Laudon; Staffan Åkerblom; Mats B Nilsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.