Literature DB >> 15220060

Modeling the atmospheric transport and deposition of mercury to the Great Lakes.

Mark Cohen1, Richard Artz, Roland Draxler, Paul Miller, Laurier Poissant, David Niemi, Dominique Ratté, Marc Deslauriers, Roch Duval, Rachelle Laurin, Jennifer Slotnick, Todd Nettesheim, John McDonald.   

Abstract

A special version of the NOAA HYSPLIT_4 model has been developed and used to estimate the atmospheric fate and transport of mercury in a North American modeling domain. Spatial and chemical interpolation procedures were used to expand the modeling results and provide estimates of the contribution of each source in a 1996 anthropogenic US/Canadian emissions inventory to atmospheric mercury deposition to the Great Lakes. While there are uncertainties in the emissions inventories and ambient data suitable for model evaluation are scarce, model results were found to be reasonably consistent with wet deposition measurements in the Great Lakes region and with independent measurement-based estimates of deposition to Lake Michigan. Sources up to 2000 km from the Great Lakes contributed significant amounts of mercury through atmospheric transport and deposition. While there were significant contributions from incineration and metallurgical sources, coal combustion was generally found to be the largest contributor to atmospheric mercury deposition to the Great Lakes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15220060     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2003.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  9 in total

1.  Mercury trends in fish from rivers and lakes in the United States, 1969-2005.

Authors:  Ann T Chalmers; Denise M Argue; David A Gay; Mark E Brigham; Christopher J Schmitt; David L Lorenz
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Long-term dynamics of total mercury in surficial bottom sediments of the Volga River's reservoir in central Russia.

Authors:  Yury G Udodenko; Viktor T Komov; Viktor V Zakonnov
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Great Lakes fish consumption advisories: is mercury a concern?

Authors:  Satyendra P Bhavsar; Emily Awad; Chris G Mahon; Steve Petro
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Estimation and mapping of wet and dry mercury deposition across northeastern North America.

Authors:  Eric K Miller; Alan Vanarsdale; Gerald J Keeler; Ann Chalmers; Laurier Poissant; Neil C Kamman; Raynald Brulotte
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Mercury temporal trends in top predator fish of the Laurentian Great Lakes.

Authors:  Tiffany J Zananski; Thomas M Holsen; Philip K Hopke; Bernard S Crimmins
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 6.  Risks and benefits of consumption of Great Lakes fish.

Authors:  Mary E Turyk; Satyendra P Bhavsar; William Bowerman; Eric Boysen; Milton Clark; Miriam Diamond; Donna Mergler; Peter Pantazopoulos; Susan Schantz; David O Carpenter
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Mercury source changes and food web shifts alter contamination signatures of predatory fish from Lake Michigan.

Authors:  Ryan F Lepak; Joel C Hoffman; Sarah E Janssen; David P Krabbenhoft; Jacob M Ogorek; John F DeWild; Michael T Tate; Christopher L Babiarz; Runsheng Yin; Elizabeth W Murphy; Daniel R Engstrom; James P Hurley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sources of mercury exposure for U.S. seafood consumers: implications for policy.

Authors:  Noelle E Selin; Elsie M Sunderland; Christopher D Knightes; Robert P Mason
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Modeling and mapping of atmospheric mercury deposition in adirondack park, new york.

Authors:  Xue Yu; Charles T Driscoll; Jiaoyan Huang; Thomas M Holsen; Bradley D Blackwell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.