Literature DB >> 11032129

Pools and fluxes of mercury and methylmercury in two forested catchments in Germany.

D Schwesig1, E Matzner.   

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) and methylmercury (CH3Hg+) are global pollutants, but little information is available on rates of atmospheric input, distribution and mobility in soils and catchments of central Europe. The objectives of this study were to investigate input and output fluxes of these compounds in a deciduous and a coniferous catchment in NE Bavaria (Germany), and to estimate pools and mobility of total Hg (Hgtot) and CH3Hg+ at the catchment scale. Bulk precipitation, throughfall, litterfall and runoff were collected biweekly from April 1998 to April 1999. Several soil profiles were sampled to estimate pools of Hg compounds in the catchments. In both catchments highest contents of Hgtot were found in the Oa layer of the forest floor (up to 500 ng g(-1)) and the soil storage of Hgtot calculated for a soil depth of 60 cm was approximately 890 g ha(-1) in the coniferous and 190 g ha(-1) in the deciduous catchment. Highest contents of CH3Hg+ in upland soils were observed in the Oi layer of the forest floor, and soil storage of CH3Hg+ was 4.35 g ha(-1) in the coniferous and 0.59 g ha(-1) in the deciduous catchment. The annual total deposition of Hgtot (total deposition not measured directly but calculated from throughfall and litterfall) was 541 mg ha(-1) year(-1) in the coniferous and 618 mg ha(-1) year(-1) in the deciduous catchment. Total deposition rates of CH3Hg+ were 3.5 and 2.6 mg ha(-1) year(-1). The contribution of litterfall to the total deposition of Hgtot and CH3Hg+ was 55% in the deciduous catchment. In the coniferous catchment, the contribution of litterfall to total deposition was only 29% for Hgtot, but 55% for CH3Hg+. By far the largest proportion of the deposited CH3Hg+ and Hgtot remained in the catchments (85% in the coniferous, 95% in the deciduous). As compared to remote Swedish catchments, deposition and output via runoff of Hgtot, were higher, but deposition and output of CH3Hg+ were lower in our catchments. In contrast to other studies, the annual budget revealed no differences in the mobility between the two species at the catchment scale. However, temporal patterns of the runoff fluxes and converse gradients of CH3Hg+ and Hgtot contents in the forest floor indicated differences in mobility on shorter time scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11032129     DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(00)00565-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Spatial distribution and temporal trends of mercury and arsenic in remote timberline coniferous forests, eastern of the Tibet Plateau, China.

Authors:  Ronggui Tang; Haiming Wang; Ji Luo; Shouqin Sun; Yiwen Gong; Jia She; Youchao Chen; Yang Dandan; Jun Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Estimation and mapping of wet and dry mercury deposition across northeastern North America.

Authors:  Eric K Miller; Alan Vanarsdale; Gerald J Keeler; Ann Chalmers; Laurier Poissant; Neil C Kamman; Raynald Brulotte
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Mercury concentrations in Bicknell's thrush and other insectivorous passerines in Montane forests of northeastern North America.

Authors:  Christopher C Rimmer; Kent P Mcfarland; David C Evers; Eric K Miller; Yves Aubry; Daniel Busby; Robert J Taylor
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Background mercury concentrations in river water in Maine, U.S.A.

Authors:  John M Peckenham; J Steven Kahl; Barry Mower
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 5.  A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use.

Authors:  Daniel Obrist; Jane L Kirk; Lei Zhang; Elsie M Sunderland; Martin Jiskra; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.