Literature DB >> 15931511

Clinical results of an open prospective study of a bis-GMA composite in percutaneous vertebral augmentation.

Jean Palussière1, Jérôme Berge, Afshin Gangi, Anne Cotten, Anne Pasco, Rudolf Bertagnoli, Hans Jaksche, Paolo Carpeggiani, Hervé Deramond.   

Abstract

In this open prospective trial, 53 patients with acute pain from osteoporotic vertebral fracture related to osteoporosis or malignancy underwent vertebral augmentation with a new bisphenol-a-glycidyl dimethacrylate (bis-GMA) resin (Cortoss, Orthovita, Malvern, Pa, USA). Treatment consisted of up to 8 ml of Cortoss injected into a given vertebra. The procedure encompassed single and multiple injections (including the contralateral hemivertebra, to a maximum of 3 vertebral levels). Follow-up was at 4 and 8 days and at 1, 3, and 6 months. The primary efficacy end point was patient-rated pain using a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS, with 100 as severest pain) on day 4 following treatment; secondary end points were analgesic use and quality-of-life and disability scores from the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a short-form 12-item questionnaire (SF-12). The present report contains interim results collected up to the 1-month post-treatment time point. At baseline, the group's mean VAS score was 69, indicating moderate to severe pain; at day 4, 32 of 53 patients (60.4%) reported a 30% or greater reduction in baseline pain accompanied by a VAS pain score less than 50 (mean 38.1). Pain reduction was maintained at 1 month (mean VAS 31.3). The average ODI score at baseline was 55, suggesting significant disability among participants prior to Cortoss treatment. Following treatment, the ODI scores were significantly reduced from these baseline levels (day 8, 47.4; 1 month, 33.6). Further, SF-12 physical and mental component scores at 1 month after treatment increased from baseline by 26% and 11%, respectively; while analgesic use decreased concomitantly, primarily among patients with underlying osteoporosis. A total of 20 adverse events were deemed to be device-related. The most frequent clinically significant adverse events attributed to Cortoss were leakage of Cortoss from within the vertebral body at placement (12%), back pain (7%), and unspecified pain (7%). These results indicate that vertebral augmentation with Cortoss rapidly reduces pain, decreases disability, and improves physical functioning in patients with painful vertebral compression fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15931511     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0664-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  The effect of monomer-to-powder ratio on the material properties of cranioplastic.

Authors:  L E Jasper; H Deramond; J M Mathis; S M Belkoff
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects.

Authors:  M E Jensen; A J Evans; J M Mathis; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft; J E Dion
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  S L Silverman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Radio-opaque agents in bone cement increase bone resorption.

Authors:  A Sabokbar; Y Fujikawa; D W Murray; N A Athanasou
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-01

6.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: quantitative prospective evaluation of long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Gregg H Zoarski; Paige Snow; Wayne J Olan; M J Bernadette Stallmeyer; Bradley W Dick; J Richard Hebel; Marian De Deyne
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Favourable results of acrylic cementation for giant cell tumors.

Authors:  B M Persson; L Ekelund; R Lövdahl; B Gunterberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1984-04

8.  Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; S J Jacobsen; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty].

Authors:  P Galibert; H Deramond; P Rosat; D Le Gars
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.553

10.  Anterior decompression and stabilization of the spine as a treatment for vertebral collapse and spinal cord compression from metastatic malignancy.

Authors:  K D Harrington
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  13 in total

1.  [Filler materials for augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral fractures].

Authors:  M Arabmotlagh; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Load bearing capacity of bone anchored fiber-reinforced composite device.

Authors:  Ahmed Mansour Ballo; Lippo V Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Timo O Närhi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-09       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Aluminium-free glass polyalkenoate cements: ion release and in vitro antibacterial efficacy.

Authors:  A W Wren; J P Hansen; S Hayakawa; M R Towler
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Osteomyelitis: Recent advances in pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Mitchell C Birt; David W Anderson; E Bruce Toby; Jinxi Wang
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-26

Review 5.  [Transoral vertebroplasty: an alternative for operative treatment of metastases of the upper cervical spine].

Authors:  A Krüger; M Schnabel; A Hegele; S Ruchholtz; R Stiletto
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Sacroplasty in a cadaveric trial: comparison of CT and fluoroscopic guidance with and without balloon assistance.

Authors:  L Grossterlinden; P G C Begemann; W Lehmann; J Nuechtern; U Schumacher; H D Nagel; W Linhart; G Adam; J M Rueger; D Briem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Quality of life in glaucoma and three other chronic diseases: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Tim Mills; Simon K Law; John Walt; Patricia Buchholz; Jan Hansen
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Osteoblast proliferation and maturation on bioactive fiber-reinforced composite surface.

Authors:  Ahmed Mansour Ballo; Anne K Kokkari; Ville V Meretoja; Lippo L Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Timo O Narhi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  The processing, mechanical properties and bioactivity of strontium based glass polyalkenoate cements.

Authors:  Anthony Wren; Daniel Boyd; M R Towler
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Osteoblast response to dimethacrylate composites varying in composition, conversion and roughness using a combinatorial approach.

Authors:  Nancy J Lin; Sheng Lin-Gibson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.