Rebecca Taylor1, Kenneth Taguchi. 1. Division of General Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. beccaanntaylor@hotmail.com <beccaanntaylor@hotmail.com>
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT) published results in 1998 showing that the use of tamoxifen in high-risk women reduced the incidence of invasive breast cancer by 49%. We examined the clinical impact of the BCPT to determine whether high-risk women informed of these results would use tamoxifen for chemoprophylaxis and to investigate the factors influencing this decision. METHODS: Of 345 women evaluated for a breast lump at a referral center, 89 were defined as high risk for but did not currently have cancer. These women were contacted about their elevated risk and informed that there exists a medication proved to reduce this risk. They were encouraged to discuss the issue with their family physician, to whom we sent copies of the 3 largest tamoxifen chemoprevention studies, including the BCPT. Follow-up was conducted by telephone to determine each woman's choice regarding tamoxifen use for chemoprevention and to ascertain her reasons for reaching this decision. RESULTS: Of the 89 high-risk women, 1 decided to take tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention. Only 48 women discussed tamoxifen with their family physician; in 3 cases (3.4%) the family physician recommended that the patient start taking tamoxifen, in 8 cases (9.1%) the family physician made no recommendations, and in 37 cases (42%) the family physician advised against tamoxifen. The most frequently cited factors influencing the decision not to start tamoxifen were a fear of adverse events (46.8%), the family physician's recommendation (31.9%), and a perceived low breast cancer risk (34%). CONCLUSION: Family physicians recommended prophylactic tamoxifen to few women and even fewer women chose to take it. The major barrier appears to be concern about potential adverse effects of tamoxifen.
PURPOSE: The Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT) published results in 1998 showing that the use of tamoxifen in high-risk women reduced the incidence of invasive breast cancer by 49%. We examined the clinical impact of the BCPT to determine whether high-risk women informed of these results would use tamoxifen for chemoprophylaxis and to investigate the factors influencing this decision. METHODS: Of 345 women evaluated for a breast lump at a referral center, 89 were defined as high risk for but did not currently have cancer. These women were contacted about their elevated risk and informed that there exists a medication proved to reduce this risk. They were encouraged to discuss the issue with their family physician, to whom we sent copies of the 3 largest tamoxifen chemoprevention studies, including the BCPT. Follow-up was conducted by telephone to determine each woman's choice regarding tamoxifen use for chemoprevention and to ascertain her reasons for reaching this decision. RESULTS: Of the 89 high-risk women, 1 decided to take tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention. Only 48 women discussed tamoxifen with their family physician; in 3 cases (3.4%) the family physician recommended that the patient start taking tamoxifen, in 8 cases (9.1%) the family physician made no recommendations, and in 37 cases (42%) the family physician advised against tamoxifen. The most frequently cited factors influencing the decision not to start tamoxifen were a fear of adverse events (46.8%), the family physician's recommendation (31.9%), and a perceived low breast cancer risk (34%). CONCLUSION: Family physicians recommended prophylactic tamoxifen to few women and even fewer women chose to take it. The major barrier appears to be concern about potential adverse effects of tamoxifen.
Authors: M C King; S Wieand; K Hale; M Lee; T Walsh; K Owens; J Tait; L Ford; B K Dunn; J Costantino; L Wickerham; N Wolmark; B Fisher Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-11-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrew N Freedman; Barry I Graubard; Sowmya R Rao; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Mitchell H Gail Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-04-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: J P Costantino; M H Gail; D Pee; S Anderson; C K Redmond; J Benichou; H S Wieand Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1999-09-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: J A Cauley; L Norton; M E Lippman; S Eckert; K A Krueger; D W Purdie; J Farrerons; A Karasik; D Mellstrom; K W Ng; J J Stepan; T J Powles; M Morrow; A Costa; S L Silfen; E L Walls; H Schmitt; D B Muchmore; V C Jordan; L G Ste-Marie Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: J Cuzick; J Forbes; R Edwards; M Baum; S Cawthorn; A Coates; A Hamed; A Howell; T Powles Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-09-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Laura L Reimers; Parijatham S Sivasubramanian; Dawn Hershman; Mary Beth Terry; Heather Greenlee; Julie Campbell; Kevin Kalinsky; Matthew Maurer; Ramona Jayasena; Rossy Sandoval; Maria Alvarez; Katherine D Crew Journal: Breast J Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Celia Patricia Kaplan; Sue E Kim; Sabrina T Wong; George F Sawaya; Judith M E Walsh; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Sarah B Blakeslee; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Patricia A Parker; Christine M Gunn; Hanna Bandos; Therese B Bevers; Tracy A Battaglia; Angela Fagerlin; Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn; Christine Holmberg Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2017-06-27
Authors: Erika A Waters; Timothy S McNeel; Worta McCaskill Stevens; Andrew N Freedman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Laura H Rosenberger; Ryan Weber; Daniel Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Debra A Mangino; Monica Morrow; Melissa L Pilewskie Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-01-28 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; William Fulp; Elizabeth Matos Gomez; Elissa Clayton; Sharon Tollin; Nazanin Khakpour; Christine Laronga; Marie Catherine Lee; John V Kiluk Journal: Breast Date: 2014-12-06 Impact factor: 4.380