Literature DB >> 11508619

Patient reluctance toward tamoxifen use for breast cancer primary prevention.

E R Port1, L L Montgomery, A S Heerdt, P I Borgen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) P-1 trial demonstrated that tamoxifen reduces the incidence of new breast cancers by 49% in women at increased risk for breast cancer development. Tamoxifen does have side effects, however, including marginally increased risks of endometrial cancer and thromboembolic events. In this study, women at increased risk for breast cancer development were offered tamoxifen. Their knowledge of tamoxifen as a chemopreventive agent was assessed, and factors influencing their acceptance of tamoxifen and willingness to take it were determined.
METHODS: Forty-three patients were identified who qualified to take tamoxifen for primary prevention. Patients qualified by having at least a 1.7% 5-year risk of developing breast cancer, the criteria for entry into the NSABP P-1 trial. Patients initially completed questionnaires designed to assess their knowledge of tamoxifen and its associated risks and benefits. Patients were then provided neutral educational sessions and literature delineating the actual risks and benefits of tamoxifen. Subsequently, patients' decisions regarding taking tamoxifen were reassessed.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 52.8 years, with a range of 39 to 74 years. Ten patients (23.2%) qualified based on the presence of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), seven patients (16.3%) qualified based on increased risk secondary to age >60 years, and 26 patients (60.5%) age range 35 to 59 qualified based on risk profiles demonstrating significantly increased risk. Of the total 43 patients, two (4.7%) elected to start taking tamoxifen. Fifteen patients (34.8%) declined immediately, and 26 patients (60.5%) were undecided initially but ultimately declined. Educational sessions did not influence patients' decisions. Fear of side effects, including endometrial cancer, thromboembolic events, and menopausal symptoms, was the most commonly cited reason for declining to take tamoxifen.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the vast majority of patients at increased risk for breast cancer perceived that the risks of taking tamoxifen outweighed the benefits and declined to take it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11508619     DOI: 10.1007/s10434-001-0580-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  63 in total

Review 1.  Patient decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary E Ropka; Jess Keim; John T Philbrick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: safety warning.

Authors:  Eric Wooltorton
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-08-20       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Soy isoflavone supplementation for breast cancer risk reduction: a randomized phase II trial.

Authors:  Seema A Khan; Robert T Chatterton; Nancy Michel; Michelle Bryk; Oukseub Lee; David Ivancic; Richard Heinz; Carola M Zalles; Irene B Helenowski; Borko D Jovanovic; Adrian A Franke; Maarten C Bosland; Jun Wang; Nora M Hansen; Kevin P Bethke; Alexander Dew; Margerie Coomes; Raymond C Bergan
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-02

4.  Breast Cancer Chemoprevention among High-risk Women and those with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Laura L Reimers; Parijatham S Sivasubramanian; Dawn Hershman; Mary Beth Terry; Heather Greenlee; Julie Campbell; Kevin Kalinsky; Matthew Maurer; Ramona Jayasena; Rossy Sandoval; Maria Alvarez; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Affective forecasting and medication decision making in breast-cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Laura D Scherer; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Willingness to use tamoxifen to prevent breast cancer among diverse women.

Authors:  Celia Patricia Kaplan; Sue E Kim; Sabrina T Wong; George F Sawaya; Judith M E Walsh; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Molecular targets for cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  William N William; John V Heymach; Edward S Kim; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Explanations for side effect aversion in preventive medical treatment decisions.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Neil D Weinstein; Graham A Colditz; Karen Emmons
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Women's decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Vijayan Nair; Holly A Derry; Jennifer B McClure; Sarah Greene; Azadeh Stark; Sharon Hensley Alford; Paula Lantz; Daniel F Hayes; Cheryl Wiese; Sarah Claud Zweig; Rosemarie Pitsch; Aleksandra Jankovic; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  First-degree relatives of axial spondyloarthritis patients of the pre-SpA cohort would consider using medication in a preventive setting.

Authors:  Janneke J de Winter; Henriëtte M de Jong; Pythia T Nieuwkerk; Irene E van der Horst-Bruinsma; Dominique L Baeten; Marleen G van de Sande
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.