Literature DB >> 15925188

The relationship between stream segregation and frequency discrimination in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Marina M Rose1, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

We examined the relationship between the fission boundary (FB) at which a sequence of pure tones alternating between two frequencies cannot be heard as two separate streams and the frequency difference limen (FDL), using normally hearing subjects and subjects with cochlear hearing loss. The stimuli used in the two tasks were as similar as possible in duration and inter-tone interval. The frequency range examined was 250-8000 Hz for the normally hearing subjects and 250-2000 Hz for the hearing-impaired subjects. For normally hearing subjects, the FBs were almost invariant with frequency when expressed as ERB(N) values; the mean FB was about 0.4 ERB(N). The FDLs, also expressed as ERB(N) values, increased for frequencies above 2000 Hz. The ratio FB/FDL was roughly constant at 7-9 in the frequency region 250-2000 Hz, but decreased for higher frequencies, reaching about 1 at 8000 Hz. For the hearing-impaired subjects, FB/FDL ratios varied over a large range (1-40), and were not systematically related to the amount of hearing loss. These results suggest that the FB is not determined solely by the discriminability of successive tones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15925188     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  18 in total

1.  Streaming of vowel sequences based on fundamental frequency in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Sequential stream segregation using temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Robert S Hong; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory stream segregation in children with Asperger syndrome.

Authors:  T Lepistö; A Kuitunen; E Sussman; S Saalasti; E Jansson-Verkasalo; T Nieminen-von Wendt; T Kujala
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Behavioral measures of auditory streaming in ferrets (Mustela putorius).

Authors:  Ling Ma; Christophe Micheyl; Pingbo Yin; Andrew J Oxenham; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Auditory Stream Segregation in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Benefits and Downsides of Superior Perceptual Processes.

Authors:  Lucie Bouvet; Laurent Mottron; Sylviane Valdois; Sophie Donnadieu
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-05

7.  Auditory stream segregation impairments in schizophrenia.

Authors:  David M Weintraub; Erin M Ramage; Griffin Sutton; Erik Ringdahl; Aaron Boren; Amanda C Pasinski; Nick Thaler; Michael Haderlie; Daniel N Allen; Joel S Snyder
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Effect of spectral smearing on the perceptual segregation of vowel sequences.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Behavioral frequency discrimination ability of partially deafened cats using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yuri B Benovitski; Peter J Blamey; Graeme D Rathbone; James B Fallon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Effects of unilateral input and mode of hearing in the better ear: self-reported performance using the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale.

Authors:  Noël Y Dwyer; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.