Literature DB >> 15914644

Spatial frequency sensitivity differences between adults of good and poor reading ability.

Geoffrey R Patching1, Timothy R Jordan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether normal adults of good and poor reading ability exhibit different patterns of sensitivity to spatial frequency, as previously found between dyslexic and nondyslexic control subjects.
METHODS: The visual acuity, spatial frequency sensitivity, and reading ability of 96 normal, nondyslexic adults was assessed. Participants were ranked according to reading ability. The top 50% were classified as good readers and the bottom 50% as poor readers.
RESULTS: Despite no differences in visual acuity, good and poor readers showed different patterns of spatial frequency sensitivity. In particular, compared with good readers, poor readers showed reduced sensitivity to spatial frequencies between 2 and 6 cyc/deg, and no differences in sensitivity were found at lower or higher spatial frequencies.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that spatial frequency sensitivity differences found previously between dyslexic and nondyslexic controls can extend to the normal (nondyslexic) adult population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15914644     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-1247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  16 in total

1.  Effects of increased letter spacing on word identification and eye guidance during reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

2.  Accessibility attributes of blood glucose meter and home blood pressure monitor displays for visually impaired persons.

Authors:  Morgan V Blubaugh; Mark M Uslan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

3.  Contrast responsivity in MT+ correlates with phonological awareness and reading measures in children.

Authors:  Michal Ben-Shachar; Robert F Dougherty; Gayle K Deutsch; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Reading with a filtered fovea: the influence of visual quality at the point of fixation during reading.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Victoria A McGowan; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

5.  Enhancing the contrast sensitivity function through action video game training.

Authors:  Renjie Li; Uri Polat; Walter Makous; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Reading direction and the central perceptual span: evidence from Arabic and English.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Abubaker A A Almabruk; Eman A Gadalla; Victoria A McGowan; Sarah J White; Lily Abedipour; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

7.  Eye movements reveal effects of visual content on eye guidance and lexical access during reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of adult aging on reading filtered text: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Reading direction and the central perceptual span in Urdu and English.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Sarah J White; Sameen Malik; Lily Abedipour; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Seeing Inscriptions on the Shroud of Turin: The Role of Psychological Influences in the Perception of Writing.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Mercedes Sheen; Lily Abedipour; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.