Literature DB >> 22949037

Reading with a filtered fovea: the influence of visual quality at the point of fixation during reading.

Timothy R Jordan1, Victoria A McGowan, Kevin B Paterson.   

Abstract

Reading relies critically on processing text in foveal vision during brief fixational pauses, and high-quality visual input from foveal text is fundamental to theories of reading. However, the quality of visual input from foveal text that is actually functional for reading and the effects of this input on reading performance are unclear. To investigate these issues, a moving, gaze-contingent foveal filtering technique was developed to display areas of text within foveal vision that provided only coarse, medium, or fine scale visual input during each fixational pause during reading. Normal reading times were unaffected when foveal text up to three characters wide at the point of fixation provided any one visual input (coarse, medium, or fine). Wider areas of coarse visual input lengthened reading times, but reading still occurred, and normal reading times were completely unaffected when only medium or fine visual input extended across the entire fovea. Further analyses revealed that each visual input had no effect on the number of fixations made when normal text was read, that adjusting fixation durations helped preserve reading efficiency for different visual inputs, and that each visual input had virtually no effect on normal saccades. These findings indicate that, despite the resolving power of foveal vision and the emphasis placed on high-quality foveal visual input by theories of reading, normal reading functions with similar success using a range of restricted visual inputs from foveal text, even at the point of fixation. Some implications of these findings for theories of reading are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22949037     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0307-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  33 in total

1.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Patching; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

3.  Adaptation to spatial stimuli.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Not all aberrations are equal: reading impairment depends on aberration type and magnitude.

Authors:  Laura K Young; Simon P Liversedge; Gordon D Love; Richard M Myers; Hannah E Smithson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Visual requirements for reading.

Authors:  S G Whittaker; J Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A W Inhoff; R E Morrison; M L Slowiaczek; J H Bertera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The design and use of a new near-vision chart.

Authors:  I L Bailey; J E Lovie
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1980-06

8.  Reading without a fovea.

Authors:  K Rayner; J H Bertera
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Out of sight, out of mind: the rarity of assessing and reporting participants' visual abilities when studying perception of linguistic stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Victoria A McGowan; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Eye movements when reading disappearing text: the importance of the word to the right of fixation.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge; Sarah J White
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  5 in total

1.  Differential effects of viewing positions on standard versus semantic Stroop interference.

Authors:  Ludovic Ferrand; Maria Augustinova
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

2.  Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Jasmine Dixon; Victoria A McGowan; Stoyan Kurtev; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-28

3.  Effects of adult aging on reading filtered text: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Seeing Inscriptions on the Shroud of Turin: The Role of Psychological Influences in the Perception of Writing.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Mercedes Sheen; Lily Abedipour; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Investigating the Effectiveness of Spatial Frequencies to the Left and Right of Central Vision during Reading: Evidence from Reading Times and Eye Movements.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Victoria A McGowan; Stoyan Kurtev; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.